Here is a particularly light-filled person who I regard with the highest respect talking with another person of perspicacity. From the book 'Questioning Krishnamurti' (1996) and the section 'What Future Does Man Have?' we see David Bohm FRS talking to Krishna, as Joseph Campbell and his friends called him before his death. Please complete the last sentence in as many ways as you can.


"DB: Well, perhaps we could bring it out still more. That is, thought is limited, even though there is a very strong predisposition, feeling, tendency, to feel that thought can do anything.
K: But it can't. See what it has done in the world!
DB: Well, I agree that it has done some terrible things but that doesn't prove that it is always wrong. You see, maybe you could always blame that on people who have used it wrongly.
K: I know, that is a good old trick! But thought in itself is limited, therefore whatever it does is limited.
DB: And you are saying it is limited in a very serious way.
K: That's right, in a very, very serious way.
DB: Well, could we bring that out, and say what way that is?
K: That way is what is happening in the world. The totalitarian ideals are the invention of thought.
DB: Yes, we could say that the very word 'totalitarian' means they wanted to cover the totality but they couldn't - and the thing collapsed.
K: It is collapsing.
DB: But then there are those who say they are not totalitarians.
K: But the thinking of the democrats, the republicans and the idealists and so on is also limited.
DB: Yes, limited in a way that is...
K: …very destructive.
DB: … that is very serious and destructive. Now in what way could we bring that out?
You see, I could say, 'OK, my thought is limited but this may not be all that serious.' Why is it so important?
K: That is fairly simple: because whatever action is born of limited thought must inevitably breed conflict. Dividing humanity geographically into nationalities and dividing humanity religiously and so on has created havoc in the world.
DB: Yes, let's connect that with the limitation of thought. That is, my knowledge is limited. Now how does that lead me to divide the world?
K: Aren't we seeking security? We thought there was security in the family, security in the tribe, security in nationalism. So we thought there was security in division.
DB: Yes, that seems to be how it has come out: take the tribe, for example; one may feel insecure and then say, 'with the tribe I am…."


I LOVE Krishnamurti! Einstein would agree the divisions are dangerous too. That is why he recommended an International Police Force and the end to all standing armies. It was his life's greatest purpose which is saying a lot considering all his thoughtful contributions of heart and soul. We need more than ever to register and regulate with true transparency the technological and religious techniques that hold so many in their grasp or provide so much opportunity for power-hungry people to enslave even more of our souls. The alienated humans who mistakenly believe they are in higher echelons of power disparage those who never were so cursed as to wish their fellow man such evil.


The Ten Commandments are said to have originated in the Egyptian Book of the Dead which greatly predate Moses who might well have learned them from this book when he was Pharaoh of Egypt. Mt. Serabôt might be the site of an ancient alchemic manufacturing site for the 'white powder' as Gardner says in 'Genesis of the Grail Kings', his photos are good and compelling evidence. It does make some sense of the 'burning bush' fiction if one contemplates the ignorant and uninformed who watched the fires of the alchemic cauldrons and crucibles from below. Meanwhile Moses the ousted Pharaoh was checking to see if the loyal priests at the top of this mountain would act on his behalf to return him to power. It might well have been better if they made him the source of energy in their kilns or did return him to Egypt. Moses was a great magician but that is not the kind of leader we should be emulating. Still I admire his inventive creativity in coming up with the 'tablets of stone carved by the fire of God'.


The horror of the ignorance or the predilection of ego and thought that Krishnamurti relates to is well written and created in this Bible and its narratives long legged and far reaching tentacles of terror. The Pope now says there is no Hell, but I think it is well imbedded in the minds of his sheep. It is not enough to say it doesn't exist and admit to the hellish horrors they have created. I hope you won't easily forgive an organization whose precursors killed Jesus of Nazareth and tried to kill his family members so they could blame others. I hope you will join me in demanding they lay out a plan to police and expose their pedophiles and hate-mongerers, with a view to correcting their damage done. I hope you will demand action and not weasel words. In fact I hope their wealth is distributed to the native people of Central America, and the rest of the world that are the victims of their continuing reign of fear and ignorance!


From another scholar on the Scrolls comes a book titled 'The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception', it is written by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh who are scholars that got to study these papyrus scrolls before the Huntington Library disseminated some of them, before the people in Israel wanted them to do so. These books or Scrolls from a library that sought to keep the Romans from doing the same thing they had done to the Keltic and every other story of ancient times that were discovered in 1947. They say on page 188 the following things about the major Roman agent that took over the church that was originally trying to spread the words of Jesus and the 'Brotherhood of Man' – Paul!


"If James played so important a role in the events of the time, why do we know so little about him? Eisenman stresses that James, whether he was literally Jesus' brother or not, had known Jesus in a way that Paul never did. In his teachings, he was actually closer to the 'source' than Paul ever was. And his objectives were often at variance with Paul's - were sometimes, indeed, diametrically opposed. With the triumph of Pauline Christianity, therefore James's significance if it couldn't be obliterated completely, had, at the very least, to be diminished.


Unlike a number of personalities in the New Testament, James does seem to have been an historical personage."


Here we see the people of Paul's camp trying to kill James and we know Pauline Christianity was responsible for anti-Semitism as well. Is this projecting one's own actions on to another, or in the common vernacular 'a frame up'? And yes! MacDari isn't the only one who knows they also created fictional characters in their constant revisions and re-writing of the Bible. The C.I.A. and all the alphabet soup agencies have historical precedents galore to be sure. Perhaps the best evidence of the advanced nature of previous civilizations is the degree to which they have been able to dupe their own people and those who they wished to conquer or otherwise enslave and co-opt.


Thankfully the Gospel of Thomas was hidden by the Gnostic priesthood and survived the 1600 or more years. These Gnostics who probably were just as muddled and subject to the effects of myth-making in their following did contribute to the Corpus Hermeticum and were part of the 'source' that Jesus studied. Now we must endeavour to carry out a plan that Jesus would encourage and I believe that is the freeing of the minds and souls of everyone on earth. This is the nature of goodness and anything less is fraught with the 'thought' that Krishnamurti speaks to and serves the rationale and ego of those who need easy answers.


The Eranos Conferences at Lake Maggiore included people I would have to say were true scholars in search of answers that are seldom easy and often uncertain. The following story from the life of Joseph Campbell and his biography indicates fact that I am not the originator of the cell theory of cultural diffusion in man's stages of advancing awareness. On page 444 from 'A Fire in the Mind' it says:


"It was Najagneg, another primitive shaman from the northern rim of the Arctic, whom Campbell would later quote again and again: 'All we know is that the voice (of Sila) is gentle, like a woman's: a voice so fine and gentle that even children cannot become afraid. And what it says is: Be not afraid of the universe!'


The remarkable thing about his presentation of this material at Eranos was that once again Campbell had differed with orthodox Jungian thought in his portrayal of the cultural origins of archetypal forms, educating the archetypalists about the anthropological principle of cultural diffusion."


Another author and a person mentioned earlier will give further insight and integration of some of the connections that exist in the origins of our 'religious education' that Churchward referred to, when he wrote about the T-square of Ptah. Dion Fortune wrote a book in 1935 called 'The Mystical Qabalah' and he says on page 13: "2. The student of the Qabalah goes to work in exactly the opposite way to the student of natural science; the latter builds up synthetic concepts; the former analyzes abstract concepts. It goes without saying, however, that before a concept can be analyzed it must first be assembled. Someone must have thought out the principles that are resumed in the symbol which is the object of meditation of the Qabalist. Who then were the first Qaballists who built up the whole scheme? The Rabbis are unanimous upon this point, they were the angels. In other words, it was beings of another order of creation than humanity who gave the Chosen People their Qabalah.�


Whether Sila, Ascended Masters, or the pantheon of Druidic lore with all its fairies and gnomes actually exist is one of the things that scares a lot of people in academia; they can't touch or feel it any more than sub-atomic particles and therefore they think it doesn't exist; which I have enjoyed the imagery of the toilet in regards to. I think they are scared for other reasons as well. Their control and very esteem or standing are threatened. I do not buy that excuse that religion or spiritism is explaining something that science cannot. I say closed minds can't conceive the observable results and come to logical conclusions. The soul avails answers that those down to earth 'experts' of direct inference like psychiatrists or doctors who negate 'chi' and its use by acupuncture, are genuinely afraid of. Names such as angels or even monsters (such as at the edge of the flat earth) relate to dimensional energy, that are perceived according to both Jung and Campbell's points of view as well as creative potentials of unlimited origin. The science of 'altered states' and alternative universes is actually ahead of religious thinking. In 'Behind the Crystal Ball' by Anthony Aveni in 1996 (another TIME/Life whitewash) the Gnostics are properly presented when he says on page 55:
"But the true Gnostic sought the same union with God advocated by more mainstream Christians. They felt, however, that it was not sin that cut us off from our creator, but ignorance. Gnostic life consisted of the search for true knowledge. They believed that revelation could be found among all civilized nations and that every faith contained a germ of truth that culminated in Christ. So Gnosticism was a form of religious internationalism."


The early Christian roots and the 'Brotherhood of Iesa' is really not a threatening thing for anyone who believes in Christ. It is an affirmational sharing that enhances ALL! Another perspective came my way via Wicca, and the husband and wife team who wrote the book 'A Witches' Bible'. The Farrars (Janet and Stewart) from 1981 address the different names that can be used for the spirits or dimensional energies. Some of the groups or 'cults' use the names from Norse or Egyptian cultures, but any true student knows that the names do not limit the true nature; the names are just man's way of representing these forces. They say on page 14:


"All this is reflected in the fact that it is the Greater Sabbats which have Gaelic names. Of the various forms which witches use, we have chosen the Irish Gaelic ones, for personal and historical reasons - personal because we live in Ireland, where these forms have living meaning; historical, because Ireland was the only Celtic country never to be absorbed by the Roman Empire, and so it is in Ireland's mythology and in her ancient language that the lineaments of the Old Religion can often be most clearly discerned. Even the Celtic Church remained stubbornly independent of the Vatican for many centuries. There is a tiny Russian Orthodox community in Ireland based on exiles from Russia; interestingly, 'it has attracted quite a number of Irish converts, some of whom regard it as the Irish Church which existed before the arrival of St. Patrick {Who personally burned over 150 books that we must remember were hand written - the Sumerian and Mayan duplicating methods were not being used at these times throughout most of the world.} to the years following Henry's invasion and the establishments of the links with Rome. (Sunday Press, Dublin 12th March 1978)."


The Qabala was probably not the only ancient verbal tradition that the even older church of Keltic 'travelers' spread in their mission of 'Brotherhood' and MacDari who writes a lot about this does not mention the Qabala. He after all is a Mason/Rosicrucian and they too, like to lay claim to knowledge as their own. The Qabala is involved in the knowledge of many roots of the 'source' that Jesus studied. These include but are not limited to: alchemy (metallurgy was more correctly Joseph's trade), the Tao, Gnosticism and pagan beliefs such as shamans and maybe Buddhism or Hinduism. Being as his forefather Solomon sent ships throughout the whole spherical world and returned with much knowledge there is good reason to assume he might even have studied Mayan which some say his last words were written in (and not Aramaic), perhaps I should say spoken in. There is a legend I find hard to believe that Jesus went to Mayan lands after he was brought down from the cross. This definitely would have been possible as the Bat Creek stones show many Judeans escaping Roman persecution came to the Americas and recent archaeology acknowledges the Romans came to this verdant paradise then too.


Before Christ and certainly by his time the social morays and prejudices against women were already massive. Even though (St?) Augustine was the interpreter of Genesis as proof of women being the harbingers of sin - 'original?' in a later time. Wicca says it is 25,000 years old and some of their leaders who I have talked with at length confirm that they draw their knowledge from Druidry. These Kelts never saw a need to resort to force and insecurity or fear to have their sexual needs met in their families. They respected their equal mates and knew that they had been or would be women in other incarnations of the multi-dimensional soul as time passed.


When the Jewish people were deprived of their homeland and dispersed during the 'Diaspora' they were suffering massive repulsive programs of discrimination by Catholic and later offshoots such as Martin Luther created. His words are ridiculous to an extreme seldom seen in the venomous annals of Roman inspired hatred. It is interesting to note that Vlad the Impaler of Dracula fame was a Catholic paid agent who salted wells and blamed the Jews among other heinous acts. At his time in the middle Ages the Rabbis created a book called the Zohar and thought to correct the treatment they had given women, a little. Perhaps like self-serving prayer, these men thought the treatment the Jews were receiving at the hands of the Flagellants etc., could be abated by a minor re- deification of women. I am not belittling the positive cultural impact the creation of the 'Matronit' brought about, but I am saying they did not go far enough. To talk about the horrors of religious behavior in academic terms sometimes seems to absolve one from the real and utterly disgusting aspects of these hypocrites - pursuing power! I must remind myself every time I think of religion that women are being genitally disfigured and forced into unloving arranged marriages or what amounts to prostitution without pay or concubinage.


Many scholars think the degradation of the Jewish scholarship during this period led to the use of a watered down version of the Qabala that was called the Kaballah. Assuredly many of the blessings I have spoken of earlier are often experienced by serious practitioners of these arts included in the Qabala. Healings and exorcisms are well within the potential of every man and woman on this small planet hurtling at ever faster velocity through space. The Tree of Life which is central to Kaballah is very powerful meditational 'stuff'! The next quote is from Gersholm Sholem, who I think gave a paper at the Eranos Conferences (it may have been Mircae Eliade) on the 'Golem' or 'dybbyk' and gargoyles, that are animate forms of prior inanimate matter. He says:


"Kaballah is a unique phenomena, and should not be considered to be identical with what is known as 'mysticism'. It is mysticism in fact; but at the same time it is both esotericism and theosophy. In what sense it may be called mysticism depends on the definition of the term, a matter of dispute among scholars. If the term is restricted to the profound yearning for direct communion with God through annihilation of individuality (bittul ha-yesh in hassidic terminology), then only a few manifestations of Kaballah can be designated as such, because few kaballists sought this goal, let alone formulated it openly as their final aim. However, Kaballah may be considered mysticism insofar as it seeks an apprehension of God and creation whose intrinsic elements are beyond the grasp of the intellect, although this is seldom explicitly belittled or rejected by the kaballists." {The intellect or Hod.}


A book called 'Lao Tzu: Tao te ching: a book about the way and the power of the way' by Ursula K. LeGuin, with J. P. Seaton says this on pages 28-30: "They configure chaos, confusion, a 'bewilderness' in which the mind wanders without certainties, desolate, silent, awkward. But in that milky, dim strangeness lies the way. It can't be found in the superficial order imposed by positive and negative opinions, the good/bad, yes/no moralizing that denies fear and ignores mystery. Mysticism rises from and returns to the irreducible, unsayable reality of 'this'. 'This' is the Way. This is the way."


In keeping with the exploration of the root of such knowledge and mans' ingrained instinctual PURPOSE, let me quote another academic who wrote a book in 1957 called 'Studies in The Origins of Buddhism'; his name is G.C. Pande and his book was written shortly after the space shots led to proving the 'verbal tradition' regarding a very ancient (at the time, considered pre-historic) Indus Civilization.


"The discoveries in the Indus Valley have revolutionized our perspective of the foundation of Indian religion and culture. They have shown that a civilized non-Vedic culture once existed in prehistoric India… Numerous races and cultural communities have met and struggled and mingled in the long history of Indian culture...�


Just as myths are being found to have truth or validity in archaeology and quantum physics, so they can also be applied to all other disciplines and human endeavours. The arrogance of historians is clearly not the only factor at work. It is abundantly clear to me and I hope the little of the voluminous research I have, and the presentation of some of it for you, have made it clear enough that you will check these things out for yourself. However, there is more than a little left to cover and I hope it is the best stuff you have ever read on the Pyramids. Actually I only hope that it is enough to make you question the existing paradigm presented by the Egyptologists who have much to gain by maintaining their fiction.


There is a lot of information to wade through in order to understand any issue. The process of evaluating all sides or perspectives is necessary in order to see across the chasm of the 'bewilderness' we have created by the act of ignorance and acceptance of other peoples' agenda ridden answers. If the yogic mental processing or open spiritual communion of the oak groves of the Druids was a reality in these ancient times when most cultures saw spirits and gave them their energy and life providing sustenance. Is there a value in understanding these perspectives missing in the arrogant western academic tradition? We are all students of man even if we are embroiled only in our pathetic or pubescent personal lives. These lives are part of the collective and our soul and/or spirit will learn even if our ego refuses to let our mental awareness come to the fore. In our current educational environment that negates the soul (Western proclivity), how can a history when the soul was paramount ever really be understood or 'grokked' fully?


What is 'this' and 'its' WAY? Another book called 'Beyond the Gods -- Buddhist and Taoist Mysticism' by John Blofeld in 1974 says the following on page 36:


"In Taoist hermitages could still be found recluses who cultivated the Tao by seeking through a process known as the 'internal alchemy', to create within themselves the embryo of a spirit body into which they could pass at death. This as I afterwards learnt, involved a yogic process that included contemplation, breath control, muscular movements, visualization and - in some cases, already very rare - sexual intercourse, all aimed at manipulation of three energies, spirit, generative force and breath-cum-cosmic-force. But there were others who held that the 'internal alchemy' really pertained to an esoteric means of obtaining communion with the Tao. Also, there were a few Taoists who employed the ‘alchemy’ with the intention of becoming so immersed in the Tao that the last remnants of duality between the transient individual and the Ultimate Source would vanish. These were the true Taoist mystics."


The movements referred to above may relate to Gurdjieff's system that he brought back from this same region of the world, and a valley where he said people regularly lived to over 100 years old. I expect an element of the Mudras and mutras as well as the Enneagramatic attunement that has been popularized in 'The Celestine Prophecy' are extant in these pursuits of the recluses near Tibet. He is reporting after all on just another 'Way' that comes and goes (The Tathagata) by many different names. Wisdom has many maturation stages and requirements as we age or learn and the most important first step involves being open-minded and unprejudiced to the point of never HAVING to absolutely know anything. The beliefs that divide us and separate the mind from the heart and soul are the 'devil's work', to use a phrase from the proselytes on themselves. Blofeld further says things that relate more to spiritism, and I include it so the reader might understand another semantical perspective on the mystical/esoteric/spiritual continuum. Like faith differs from magic they are often inexorably entwined through intent just as the roots of the tree join the roots of the weed/flower.


“Of considerable interest were the magical aspects of Taoism comprising relatively mundane matters such as divination, evocation of spirits, exorcism and the miraculous cure of diseases. Not all of this was mumbo-jumbo; I was able to observe Taoist recluses functioning both as physicians and 'psychiatrists' with considerable success, besides some more or less convincing evidence of supernatural beings."


Orthodox Christianity addresses 'illusion' or the Samsara of the 'busy mind' and 'fragmentation' and the focus on physicality in the following quote from 'The Philokalia' which was written around the sixth century. It has been included in some Bibles and was compiled by St. Nikodimos of the Holy Mountain and St. Makarios of Corinth. This quote from Volume One was published in 1979 and it says on the flap:


"The Philokalia has exercised an influence far greater than that of any book other than the Bible in the recent history of the Orthodox Church. It is concerned with the theme of universal importance: how may man develop his inner powers and awake from illusion; how may he overcome fragmentation and achieve spiritual wholeness; how may he attain the life of contemplative stillness and union with God. It speaks in particular about the practice of the Jesus prayer."


It appears this book might actually be interested in helping people do what Jesus did rather than just say 'he was God and we can't expect to be like him'. Illusion in this quote is the mirror of the Eastern 'Samsara' and its 'contemplative stillness' is in the words of Jesus that I think could replace the third law of the Magi - 'Be Still, and KNOW, that I AM’!