Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Irish Issue
BrainMeta.com Forum > Philosophy, Truth, History, & Politics > Enlightenment
Robert the Bruce
The expertise and advancement of the evolution of man and his culture is evident in one area only - that of propaganda and lying. They have learned how to suck and blow simultaneously out of every orifice of their bodies. Deceit, black ops (e.g. Kennewick Man), 'hide the ball' (e.g. the confusing array of Pyramid explanations) and secret agencies of advanced skill and esoteric expertise in all social structures that allow us to be 'managed'. JFK, Watergate, Iran/Contra or Ritalin, the program has a repeating plot that is rife with immorality and it’s ever-present greed. The maze the Minotaur went through on Crete is reproduced near Glastonbury (or vice versa like Karnac and Carnac) and it is harder to get through the maze these 'social engineers' create or are still trying to create.


There may have been a time when the Romish plotters had a bet with their allies in Britain over who eradicated their assigned enemy first. Most people are aware of the 'Flagellants' and the Holocaust or Inquisitions against the heretical Jews. There are few who know the Irish were almost successfully eliminated and had disappeared into the bogs so the English couldn't find them. The Mayans did the same thing with the Spanish and no doubt lots of others have sought to blend in with the environment in order to avoid such persecution by becoming 'conversos' in public. Bede was probably not the first (Eusebius and others were re-writing and plagiarizing) English historian to jump all over the Irish. Hume was a great historian in this tradition of debauched prejudice too. Here is a letter from him congratulating another conspirator in this continuing plot.


"I see you entertain a great doubt with regard to the authenticity of the poems of Ossian. You are certainly right in so doing. It is indeed strange that any men of sense could have imagined it possible, that above twenty thousand verses along with numberless historical, could have been preserved by oral tradition {Lies on paper are more easily maintained or referred back to.} during fifty generations, by the rudest, perhaps of all European nations, the most necessitous, the most turbulent, and the most unsettled. Where a supposition is so contrary to common sense, any positive evidence of it ought never to be regarded. Men run with great avidity to give their evidence in favour of what flatters their passions and their national prejudices. You are therefore over and above indulgent to us in speaking of the matter with hesitation." (2)


Yes, ego of men and their need to flatter their national prejudices are a fact of life, and not just with 'verbal tradition'. In many ways the ancient egalitarian peoples had less political and social reasons to lie, and they supported equality between all people. The Englishman who wrote this could be one of those arrogant even shockingly self-centered blankity-blanks who think God is his right hand man. The author of this letter was regarded by Edward Gibbon (who wrote the 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire') as England's greatest historian. He is David Hume and his intellectual progeny and fallout are directly connected to the far less but just as influentially prejudicial words of the great Encyclopedia. This letter is a masterwork of insipid prejudice and a deceit of monumental proportions.


We know for a fact that Hume is speaking the kind of vile invective that allowed Gibbon's friend Lord Sheffield to benefit so much from the rape of Ireland. Sheffield was a paid off absentee landowner and key political player in Britain's impoverishment of Ireland. This buying of support by giving lands in other nations claimed by 'Divine' or other debatable 'Right' has a long history in European monarchistic management. These authors of hatred and war, prejudice and ignorance, have unclean hands and obvious conflicts of interest. They were called the cause of the Rwandan genocide of the last decade in lock-step and clear order as Number one and two criminals. Number one was the Catholic Church and then the Anglican. They are not separate from their government or secular authority as the recent Canadian court awards make evident. The Catholic request for government to make payment with them for the billions they owe the Indians or the insurance companies the government works with that are paying up are all part of the menagerie.


Sein Fein was the name of a cultural revival newspaper and society began by Prof. MacManus and others. Now it is a guerilla or terrorist organization. Why do the Irish fight amongst themselves and believe in Catholicism (south or Eire) that practices the same usages as the English Anglican Church? Why is the Protestant North that feigns to abhor those usages engaged in fighting for the English? The English gave them their land and brought them there from Scotland, while making trade and taxation deals with them to ensure they remained loyal and prospered. Is the church promoting hatred and divisiveness? Sure it isn't engaged in secular matters, what with the separation of church and state and all that kind of fiction!


"Naturally, of course, the first thing that people in power should do, for a country facing starvation, was to forbid the export of foodstuff from Ireland. But, as Englishmen, having this source of supply cut off, would then have to pay a higher price for their corn, the British Government, 'could not interfere with the natural course of trade'. 'But' the Viceroy Lord Heytesbury, reassured the dying ones, 'there is no cause for alarm-the Government is carefully watching the course of events!" (5)


What a wonderfully careful Government it was, too. The movie Far and Away portrays a little of the situation and Michael Collins with Liam Neeson states there had been 700 years of war in its opening scroll. The English sent scientists to discover the effects of blight on potato crops as well as the effects of starvation on people, despite their lesser 'civilized' nature. They didn't even return a reasonable portion of the taxes they collected from Ireland during the Famine. The papers in London ridiculed and satirized (in the inimitable English intellect of Hume et. al.) the 'unsettled' or adle-brained drunken Irish, who could offer no more resistance.


"As they were unable to pay rack rent to the absentee landlord, thousands of the starving ones were thrown out, and other thousands threatened to be thrown out of their wretched homes, to perish on the roadside. In consequence frenzied poor men shot a few of the vilest of the land-agents and landlords. At the opening of the Parliament in January '46, Queen Victoria, addressing her 'Lords and Gentlemen' observed, with deep regret, the fearful situation In Ireland-adding-'It will be our duty to consider whether any measure can be devised, calculated to give peace and protection for life there.'


The simple reader, who knows not the way of the British with Ireland, would here naturally come to the conclusion that the tender-hearted gentlewoman, full of sympathy… was directing her Parliament to try to save a multitude of lives. But this would be a mistaken conclusion. She was here referring to the handful of Anglo-Irish landlords and agents, whose lives must solicitously be protected whilst, in trying times, they were endeavouring to hack and hew their usual pound of flesh from the walking skeletons in the bogs and mountains of Ireland. Some of these thoughtless ones were in danger of slaying a landlord rather than see him slay their famished wife, or hollow-eyed children. Hence the good Queen advised her 'Lords and Gentlemen' that a stringent Coercion Bill was needed, and must be provided to relieve the unfortunate conditions prevailing in Ireland. [3]
[3]-Notes: Among other benefits which the excellent Bill proposed to confer upon the suffering people, it rendered liable to fourteen years transportation away for anyone found out of his own house after the sun set in the evening and before it arose in the morning. In the operation of this beneficial Act many things occurred, that to an outsider might seem strange. For instance John Mitchell records such happenings as that of a quiet respectable farmer, who on a summer evening, when the sun was near setting, strolled a short way down the road to pay his working-men and walking back when the sun had just sunk-though it was still broad daylight-was arrested for heinous crime against 'the Queen and Constitution of this realm.’" (6)


Hitler had to pay his guards just like the Turks who made the first fenced concentration camps around this time (for the care of the Armenians). Of course the ghettoes were a form of concentration camp that cost the administrative countries that had Jews a very little amount of money. This was especially true when they were inclined periodically to dispossess them of their treasure. The Romish churchians had learned the benefits of not being an Empire and having to share the booty with the citizens of Rome in earlier times. Christianity should be studied as the pre-eminent marketing plan of this whole era we call 'his'-story. Is there a possibility that the Jews and the Irish are a threat to someone for something to do with history? Is it their inclination to regard Jesus as a man who preached truths like the divinity and freedom of each soul while on Earth? You would have to study what went on at the Synod of Whitby in 664 AD in order to get a feel for the reason the date of Easter had to be changed and to know the Celtic Church and their monastic Orders like Iona (in the Emerald Isles and in places like the Greek Islands) were a real threat to Rome. Then you would know the Jewish and Irish perception that Jesus was a prophet and not a Messiah was part of it.


The Irish were hounded and pursued, ridiculed and beat upon in all ways or methods available to man. In America as indentured slaves or Civil War soldiers (both sides, the Rebel Yell is the Keltic war cry) they were worse off than the blacks or Chinese. Over the course of a long time they lost even the bulk of their verbal tradition. Their knowledge of the Celtic Cultural Age some call Atlantis is almost non-existent. The Ossianic tales and legends bear close scrutiny despite what Hume and Gibbon have written. Taliesin was more of a fabricator or fancy and Frank Lloyd Wright was enamoured of him. It is worth noting the status of the blacks in the Christian church as well as the excellent civil rights record of this church that has been the dominant force in Western society through all the Crusades and other heretical inquisitions and divisive tactics. Gradualistic god-guided 'chosen ones' who reach rapture or the Goff, due to their elitist prejudices are soon going to get their karmic due I hope. The cells of cultural adepts like the de Danaan are getting more support as archaeology uncovers things like Gimbutas' Old European alphabet even if the gods of archaeology cling to Sumer like they did to Clovis. Richard Rudgely isn't the only one to notice if things don't fit the prevailing theory they require different standards or are thought to be a hoax. His credentials are impeccable just as were Campbell's and Gimbutas'.
Robert the Bruce
With satellites in space and the 'remote sensing' equipment thereon we have found the stuff of legend is more real than that of history. Rome gave the name of Ireland to the Irish. It is based upon the root word 'Ir' which means 'lost'. They gave the Picts their name. It meant 'Red Shanks' as the Roman soldiers ridiculed the people led by Boadicaea, a valiant Queen of the Kelts who burned London. This was rather late in the history of the Kelts who had seen their nobles and 'brothers' desert their ethics in favour of power and the Roman hegemony. The Roman Empire did NOT end with the sacking of Rome by the Merovingian Frankish 'Goths': It did not end when Caesars took power from the Roman Senate and the people of Italy, who they no longer wished to share slaves and other booty or power with, in the time of Brutus.


In point of fact, we can argue that the Romano-British Empire is more empowered today than at any other time in history. The Catholic Church may not be as powerful as it was just a century ago but it was still named as the primary promoter of the genocide in Rwanda by an International panel headed by Canada's Stephen Lewis. The New World Order that appears proudly on the U.S. one dollar bill is no mere co-incidence. And the Masons do work with the Vatican at their highest levels despite the apparent conflict between them.


Who are the Phoenicians before Sargon the Great in 2350 B.C.? He was the first one to have a legend about being borne on a bed amongst the bulrushes to avoid a dastardly tyrant. Actually he may not have been the first but he is long before Moses (which means 'leader' and appears in the Peruvian cocaine area [Moshe] where this trade in evil saw a new dimension of monopolistic greed). The drug trade at this time may never have faces and names placed upon it, but it was able to 'hook' whole civilizations for centuries. Under the guise of medicine we saw the same plot enacted in the 19th century of doctors dispensing laudanum. Potions to ensure immortal life and other elixirs have some potential basis in fact, but the bulk of such representations are falsehoods designed to enrich purveyors and pharmaceutical giants or their 'expert' psychiatrists.


A study of Smyrna and the Onassis family might uncover a lot about this particular Phoenician family enterprise or 'emporiae'. Smyrna has a history almost as long as Jericho and its nearby Miletus site of the family known as Mallia on Crete is the basis for much history. They include the founders of Massalia (Phocaeans) and Etruria (Brutti of the sons of Aeneas) which later became Marseilles and Rome. The archaeologic record assures us that 1200 B.C. was the date that the walls of Jericho and Miletus both came down. We may never have absolute proof, but normal history is full of ways to avoid even trying to include ALL the facts. We do think we can fit ALL known facts into our history. There is a disturbing re-occurrence of purpose and motive throughout history. Thus we must face ourselves as well as our past. Surely they fought back as their loved ones were burned or prostituted at the Temples run by greedy self-interest? The early nature-worship (science) religions didn't need enclosed Temples to hide what they did. The walls of fortresses were seldom seen before the 19th Century B.C.


It is a very long story full of anguish and terror that might well be about to happen all over again. This 'Brotherhood of Man' accepted all fearless, free-thinking and respectful people into its common egis or ethic. There were no immigration guards or thought-police, and the words of Lester Pearson do apply when he spoke of building a ‘vertical mosaic’. They sought to empower and enable all people to develop their disciplined soulful relationship with the Divine God within ('Be Still, and Know, that I AM [YHWH]) and without (The Buddhist completion of 'All is within' is 'the Universe'.). Students of the New Age will understand this Gnostic ecumenical internationalism. People were encouraged to live in Harmony with Nature and each other. The Keltic Creed makes it fully apparent that death was just part of living an immortal life, so when they did have to fight they fought very ferociously. Knowing we all are Divine ('We are all the children of God.') makes the diminishment of any one individual a crime against all humanity and an infringement of God (BL=Bel=Ba'al, etc.) and his/her purpose.


But the last 5,000 years has seen an abortion of the soul through the seeming good auspices of interpreters for that very soul that is Divine 'within and without' all life; and according to some even 'within' inanimate objects. The psychiatrists have been mobilized in this war against 'visions' and the 'Sun Dance' or 'Trance Possession Disorders'. Science has deemed it necessary to state things in black and white terms that indicate they understand everything far more than they actually can achieve. Yet, they are able to dump the contents of the human brain onto a computer chip (Stanford 1999) or achieve 300X the speed of light (Princeton's NEC labs, 2000). There is no absolute or limited nature to God, and Dembski's 'Intelligent Design' in Mathematics may only approach the great consciousness in the nanotubes that grow lattices we are now able to use in industry.


What would the Keltic Creed say about dumping oneself into a sentient robotic and nanotechnological host? When Bill Joy wrote about this reality in Wired Magazine from March/April 2000 he was writing as a founder of Sun Microsystems and a member of the Presidential Panel on Information Technology. He appropriately doubts the soul of man is transferred to such a robot. But did he know about 'thought-cloning' and the work of Thomas Bearden or Dr. Michael Persinger? It will not do - for the State to decide if 'humanity is redundant' or other such things contemplated by Bill Joy's article when people like Gary Hillis are willing to dump themselves into such self-powered and self-replicating robots. It is just a few years until this 'opportunity' presents itself. They DO assure us, and they are the 'experts' who include Ray Kurzweil who won the Presidential Medal for innovation and technology in 1999. Sorry to take your attention away from mere 'terrorists'.


The Olmec were black people (at least 18% of them) and their 'brothers' in Mexico around 5,000 B.C. deserve serious study and yet it is only recently that the spheres in Costa Rica are being looked into. It took until 1991 for academia to allow that the Mayan language was far more advanced and phonetic than they ever imagined. Bishop Landa (who burned the libraries and librarians) had written this fact a long time ago but it did not suit the fifty families who rule Mexico to this day to tell anyone about the Mayan people. In fact they were still trying to deny they existed in any real number when I went there in 1993. The Basque linguistic connections in Central America are proven by linguists. The Toltecs are more than readers of Carlos Castaneda might know. I think they are Druidic Ovates who escaped Roman bounty on their heads. The Bat Creek Nine that Cyrus Gordon assures us were Jews escaping Roman lions are here too. In fact America was 'the' place for religious freedom during all this 'his'-story!


Have you heard about Fort Pitt? This is well-accepted and documented fact. They salted blankets with the Plague and gave them to North American Indians during the harsh winter. Far more evil than that is something we think was at the root of the 'Invasion of Paradise' (To quote a title from a TV mini-series narrated by Kevin Costner.). William of Rubruck was a Catholic scholar/scientist who visited the origin of the Plague about a century before De Soto spread it and smallpox among the American people. He documents the marmot carrier of this deadly disease that served Europe so horribly. They not only knew about quarantining people and where or how the disease was transmitted - they knew it could be cured. Eighty million Europeans met their demise while the Catholic Flagellants blamed the Jews and burned whole sections of cities housing Jews. Even more died in America as a population of 70,000,000 became just 4,000,000 in the century that followed the arrival of Columbus with dogs at the front of his men. Churchill says they knew this and used it in his book The Island Race.


Where else does one find dogs that carry disease at the front of attacking armies? The Taino people and 300 other civilizations or tribes are with us no more. He also brought a Hebrew interpreter and trinkets for Indians. He was not on a mission to find a Chinese Khan. They were in constant contact with China during the time since the Red-Heads of Ǘrümchi or the Taklamakan Desert were near China. This may have been since 5,000 B.C. but it certainly was before 2,000 B.C. as archaeologists DO prove. You may have seen pictures of these Red-Heads in National Geographic or Discovery Magazine. As we know Hebrew is from Phoenician and so are many languages spoken by Indians of the Americas.


Paracelsus cured the whole city of Stertzing, Austria from the ravages of the Plague in 1524. He was not the first alchemist/homeopath who knew what he was doing since the time of Hippocrates. These 'Red-Heads' of the area near the present day Great Wall of China certainly left there when it became totally inhospitable around 500 A.D. They spoke a Keltic language most like the Irish and very much unlike any neighboring people. This is well-documented in The Mummies of Urumchi by Elizabeth Wayland Barber. When Genghis Khan arrived from the nearby Altaic region, in China, he found Christian Nestorian priests like Cosmos Indicopleustas (he of the Flat Earth Theory, was rewarded a Nestorian priesthood) were well-ensconced in the political framework of that eminently cultured nation. There are Byzantine coins of the 5th century found in China's emperor’s tombs.


Dr. Joan Price is a member of the American Institute of Archaeology and she has not been muzzled (surprisingly) as she documents the Sauk Indians and the Yuchi clan of Wisconsin are Buddhists from the region of this great central Asian desert. We think this people were part of a worldwide network that operated the Aleutian Island route where fair-haired people who mummified themselves were finally wiped out by Russia in the 18th century. Genetics is not the best proof we have to offer for your consideration. The Pima Indians of the American SW are reported to have Berber blood. The Melungeons of Pennsylvania are 'brothers' of the Basque and Berbers as they practiced Wicca until this very day. Abe Lincoln may have been a Melungeon.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.


Home     |     About     |    Research     |    Forum     |    Feedback  


Copyright © BrainMeta. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Last Modified Tue Jan 17 2006 12:39 am