OOPs. Error - infer you s/b infer I

Trip, your viewing profile is no more informative than Enki's. However, listening to the clues here, I can guess:

Enki and Eridug are names from Sumerian legend. Enki lives in Iraq?

It's a possibility Rick. Anything is possible contrary to most Post-modern thought.

You're also right in some regards to my viewer's profile. I am reveiled through continuous dialogue, as we all are.

I must be mostly post-modernist then, because I think some things are impossible.

I've twisted the lightbulb around many a dance fire with many a middle-eastern friend.

"Imagination is greater than knowledge."

Let me remind you gentlemen, that the topic name is the following:

Words Matrix as Base Fractal of Complex Concept or Knowledge

It seems to me that the topic have exhausted its capacities.

No arguing, just honest and insightful dialogue is what should be strived for. I realize your technique or approach may involve an arguementative style of discoure, or you seem extremely closed to outside and opposing thought (Western thought?). Is that the style you were reared in?

See through the illusion of self.

Ideas have to compete with each other, and the best will last.

Primacy fx and recency fx.

Off-topic remindment info for The People:

Murky genius of charming German student (or short remarks from the profile of M&G cjsc).

Enki of Eridug,

Are you experiencing a state of freedom now? Are you striving for freedom?

Freedom of thought and freedom of expression?

Are you versed in Western thought? From its concrete foundations and upward?

What authority do you have to start a forum topic on 'Word Matrix...."?

Are you an authority on the science of word matrix studies via educational background?

How did you come about this jnowledge.

If you are truly after an open and free dialogue about certain issues maybe if you were less sensitive to certain responses from certain members, the course of dialogue would run less threateningly, or are you just on this site to provoke and incite as opposed to evoke and insight.

You are free to consciously make that decision are you not?

"Listen not to me but the words that are coming out of my mouth."

that's it Enki,

Hang out with your wang out.

Sarcasm is a low form of wit and your paranoia makes evidence for all the attributions about your terrorist tendencies as well as the utter incongruity of your stated methodology or understanding of programming for Control.

Your racist comments here are quite troublesome and no one here (That I saw) made any reference to color and you started with the idea that you lived in a place that has no freedom so we reached out (Rick did) to suggest an opportunity exxisted for you to share something REAL about yourself including whether or not you live in Iraq. Needless to say we all can appreciate the difficulties of that part of the world that still embroils the world in all its constant and UN-holy wars that cause so many holes by the acts of real ass-holes. I am referring to your words to Trip (although I could have used similar ones directed at me).

Oh I have forgot your lordship, how could I dare to equal myself with such prominent, noble white people like you are?!!!

How could I dare not to bow before your magnanimity and over-shining wisdom?!!!
How could I - a wrecked oriental dwarf to dare not to thank the all-mighty god for such an opportunity to dare to communicate with such noble white people?!!!
How could I dare not to bow before the shining power of the second tower, which still [or maybe yet] stands so firm, in contrary to the other duplex?!!!

Enki, you sound an aweful lot like someone else who was here who went by the name of "Fat Dragon" or something like that. Is that you?

Enki is not Red Dragon - who I met personally.

Not even close - Red Dragon is a person who has real experience in the Constructs that are made by those who have Remotely Controlled huge masses of people over the last few millennia. He could actually see some were false - Enki is a total victim of these things.

You say:

Why should I share something about myself?

I DO NOT WANT. AND F.O.!


I say:

Those who care are willing to share. Those who do not share or simply pontificate false and ignorant pablum are far too many. P. U. F. O.

I read something and think there is nothing in common with the RCT.

The true theory is powerful enough when you can explain it even to a child.
Paraphrasing Albert Einstein.

When people learn new languages they make progress in the new language by steps.
Each step is accompanied by some form of jump.

You learn new word, and then some certain period of time passes necessary for biochemical changes in the brain and when the new Words Plateau forms you pass on new level of knowledge of that new language. So we learn language by jumps.

Sometimes one can work too long over learning new language, then he/she can abandon that difficult task for a while, but then, after some period of time, he starts to feel that he/she understands quite a lot on this new language. It is such a nice feeling. Feeling of new perception. Our brain is truly interesting substance.

Yes, quantum leaps of thought across chasms previously deemed inaccessible and thought impossible.

Intuition = In To It.

Thought at the speed of light.

Hyper-spatial multi-dimensional cognition.

Connect the dots.

Welcome to the new Quantum Paradigm.

Universal thought.

Not Eastern/Western.

Twisting the 'light'bulb together.

Tell me more about the 'words plateau' concept, for it is new to me.

I'm now wondering if the word 'trigger' used in the context of 'word triggers' or 'trigger words' is an appropriate coupling of words as used in the specific scenario of 'Word matrix', by believing that the word 'trigger' is commonly assosiated with 'gun' therefore contributing to unconscious (perhaps) thoughts of something powerful, threatening and harmful.

excerpt from www.gardinerosborn.com

"The Grid Lines of Force, part one"

This 'power' that man – through the shaman – had somehow instinctually discovered early in his evolution, is the power of making an 'emotional matrix' or template, which is created and reinforced by emotional energy – a psychological tool of empowerment.

It was believed that this energy was raised by a trance-induced tribe of people involved in the continuous habit of a certain kind of ritual.

For instance, the hypnagogic-trance-state is induced by a repetitive rhythm . . . which may cause the mind to resonate at a certain frequency whereby an invisible matrix is created and connected to the “matrix” of the earth.

The only way we can explain this 'emotional matrix' is that we are all so-called creatures of habit – in that our lives consist of a series of ‘repeating patterns.’ In a personal way we always repeat the things we think and do either consciously or subconsciously, and the strength of this habit depends on the intensity of emotion that we receive or we apply when we first experience something new.

In other words, it was discovered by shaman, and rather intuitively on his part, that an 'emotional matrix' or template is formed for the experience to be repeated, and it is repeated according to the strength of the emotion that created it: The projection of this emotional energy at a certain location acts like a catalyst into which our visualised thoughts are then captured and recorded. The intensity to which this 'matrix' or 'template' may succeed, depends not only on the amount of people who project this energy, but also on the right location. At least, that was their belief.

Like having a monopoly on truth. Who can do that?

9/11: What You Ought to Know
Greg Palast, September 15, 2004


On November 9, 2001, when you could still choke on the dust in the air near Ground Zero, BBC Television received a call in London from a top-level U.S. intelligence agent. He was not happy. Shortly after George W. Bush took office, he told us reluctantly, the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the FBI, "were told to back off the Saudis."

We knew that. In the newsroom, we had a document already in hand, marked, "SECRET" across the top and "199-I" - meaning this was a national security matter.

The secret memo released agents to hunt down two members of the bin Laden family operating a "suspected terrorist organization" in the USA. It was dated September 13, 2001 -- two days too late for too many. What the memo indicates, corroborated by other sources, was that the agents had long wanted to question these characters ... but could not until after the attack. By that time, these bin Laden birds had flown their American nest.

Back to the high-level agent. I pressed him to tell me exactly which investigations were spiked. None of this interview dance was easy, requiring switching to untraceable phones. Ultimately, the insider said, "Khan Labs." At the time, our intelligence agencies were on the trail of Pakistan's Dr. Strangelove, A.Q. Khan, who built Pakistan's bomb and was selling its secrets to the Libyans. But once Bush and Condoleeza Rice's team took over, the source told us, agents were forced to let a hot trail go cold. Specifically, there were limits on tracing the Saudi money behind this "Islamic bomb."

Then we made another call, this time to an arms dealer in the Mideast. He confirmed that his partner attended a meeting in 1995 at the 5-star Hotel Royale Monceau in Paris where, allegedly, Saudi billionaires agreed to fund Al Qaeda fanatics. We understood it to be protection money, not really a sign of support for their attacks. Nevertheless, rule number one of investigation is "follow the money" -- but the sheiks' piggy banks were effectively off-limits to the US agents during the Bush years. One of the men in the posh hotel's meeting of vipers happens to have been a Bush family business associate.

Before you jump to the wrong conclusion, let me tell you that we found no evidence -- none, zero, no kidding -- that George Bush knew about Al Qaeda's plan to attack on September 11. Indeed, the grim joke at BBC is that anyone accusing George Bush of knowing anything at all must have solid evidence. This is not a story of what George Bush knew but rather of his very-unfunny ignorance. And it was not stupidity, but policy: no asking Saudis uncomfortable questions about their paying off roving packs of killers, especially when those Saudis are so generous to Bush family businesses.

Yes, Bill Clinton was also a bit too tender toward the oil men of Arabia. But this you should know: In his last year in office, Clinton sent two delegations to the Gulf to suggest that the Royal family crack down on "charitable donations" from their kingdom to the guys who blew up our embassies.

But when a failed Texas oil man took over the White House in January 2001, demands on the Saudis to cut off terror funding simply stopped.

And what about the bin Laden "suspected terrorist organization"? Called the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, the group sponsors soccer teams and summer camps in Florida. BBC obtained a video of one camp activity, a speech exhorting kids on the heroism of suicide bombings and hostage takings. While WAMY draws membership with wholesome activities, it has also acted as a cover or front, say the Dutch, Indian and Bosnian governments, for the recruitment of jihadi killers.

Certainly, it was worth asking the bin Laden boys a few questions. But the FBI agents couldn't, until it was too late.

In November 2001, when BBC ran the report on the spike of investigations of Saudi funding of terror, the Bush defenders whom we'd invited to respond on air dismissed the concerns of lower level FBI agents who'd passed over the WAMY documents. No action was taken on the group headed by the bin Ladens.

Then, in May this year, fifty FBI agents surrounded, invaded and sealed off WAMY's Virginia office. It was like a bad scene out of the 'Untouchables.' The raid took place three years after our report and long after the bin Ladens had waved bye-bye. It is not surprising that the feds seized mostly empty files and a lot of soccer balls.

Why now this belated move on the bin Laden's former operation? Why not right after the September 11 attack? This year's FBI raid occurred just days after an Islamist terror assault in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Apparently, messin' with the oil sheiks gets this Administration's attention. Falling towers in New York are only for Republican convention photo ops.

The 199-I memo was passed to BBC television by the gumshoes at the National Security News Service in Washington. We authenticated it, added in our own sleuthing, then gave the FBI its say, expecting the usual, "It's baloney, a fake." But we didn't get the usual response. Rather, FBI headquarters said, "There are lots of things the intelligence community knows and other people ought not to know."

Ought not to know?

What else ought we not to know, Mr. President? And when are we supposed to forget it?

**************

Greg Palast's reports for BBC Television Newsnight and The Guardian paper of Britain (with David Pallister) on White House interference in the investigation of terrorism won a 2002 California State University Journalism School 'Project Censored' Award.

The BBC television reports, expanded and updated, will be released this month in the USA as a DVD, "Bush Family Fortunes," produced by BBC's Meirion Jones. View a 2-minute preview here.

The film will be premiered in 21 cities beginning on September 11, sponsored by Democracy for America. Sign up for Greg Palast's investigative reports here.

Tolkien took the old legends and made them a little too Christian - he is credited with showing C. S. Lewis the benefits of being Christian (if you want success as a writer).

Needless to say the books had nothing to do with Churchill - what nonsense - Gandalf is the name of an Arthurian character.

Here is a little to show the books were written before WWII.

In typical Tolkien fashion, he then decided he needed to find out what a Hobbit was, what sort of a hole it lived in, why it lived in a hole, etc. From this investigation grew a tale that he told to his younger children, and even passed round. In 1936 an incomplete typescript of it came into the hands of Susan Dagnall, an employee of the publishing firm of George Allen and Unwin (merged in 1990 with HarperCollins).

Some parts of the trilogy were writen during WWII.

the story has a basic structure that probably fits much more than the WWII scenario. Perhaps the intent wasn't to mirror a specific scenario, but to offer an archetypal 'showdown' that can fit most scenarios

"... for the composition of the Lord of the Rings went on at intervals during the years 1936 to 1949 ... The delay was, of caurse, aslo increased by the outbreak of war in 1939, ny the end of which year the tale had not yet reached the end of Book I. In spite of the darkness of the next five years, I found that the story could not now be wholly abondoned, and I plodded on, most by night, till I stood by Balin's tomb in Moria. There I halted for a long while, It was almost a year later when I went on and so came to Lothlyrien and the Great River late in 1941. In the next year I wrote the first drafts of the matter that now stands as Book III, and beginnings of Chapter 1 and 3 of Book V.......It was during 1944 that, leavin the loose ends and perplexies of a war which it was my task to conduct, or at least to report, I forced myself to tacle the journey of Frodo to Mordor ."
J.R.R. Tolkien

I think it is quite clear when how and maybe why!!!