GERMAN LAW PROTECTED ‘RIGHTS’ MORE THAN US LAW:
It was not until after the Nuremberg Trials that the rest of the world put the kinds of protections in place that had already been in place for a long time in Germany but we are found accusing Germans of the heinous crimes we actually lead. It is just like Mackenzie King in Canada who was backing Hitler and his programs in many areas, along with other blue bloods like the Bushes and their bosses the Merovingians.


“Beginning in 1907, with legislation passed in Indiana, forced sterilization on the basis of eugenic doctrine began spreading across the United States, with finally thirty states having such laws on the books. In this century, upwards of 50,000 Americans have been sterilized by order of the state. {Today we have drugs that reduce the libido or sex drive and potency of the less fortunate and victimized masses. These drugs and lobotomies which are still performed in Canada serve the same purposes.} The constitutionality of such compulsion was upheld in 1927, when the case Buck vs. Bell went before the Supreme Court. With only one dissent, the court said, in a majority opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes:


‘It is better for the world, if instead of waiting to execute offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.’


The court, in other words, went beyond saying that a person is guilty until proven innocent; it declared that hypothetical persons were presumed guilty of criminal intent even before being conceived and may not be brought into existence. The 1927 decision has never been overturned, and is still a part of the law of the land.


After World War II, German lawyers defending those accused of being Nazi war criminals for having forcibly sterilized two million people as a part of Nazi racial doctrine pointed to the sterilization laws in America and the 1927 Supreme Court decision as justification for their clients' conduct.


In his recent book, The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism and National Socialism, Stefan Kühl traces the relationships between the Nazi racial theorists and members of the American eugenics movement in the 1930s. American eugenicists and German advocates of "racial hygiene" were already communicating and sharing ''scientific'' information before the First World War. The conflict in Europe, and particularly American entry into the war against Germany, broke off all such ties. But shortly after the war's end, contacts began to reemerge, with their American colleagues being especially helpful in getting German eugenicists accepted back into their community of scholars.


Throughout the 1920s, the German proponents of racial sterilization drew upon the arguments of their American counterparts, using data the American eugenicists had collected to justify the case for distinguishing between "superior" and "inferior" racial types; they also made the case that America was more enlightened and progressive in its racial policies, since numerous American states had passed sterilization laws, while German law was "backward" in its narrow defense of individual rights that frustrated equivalent German legislation.


With Hitler's coming to power in 1933, Germany's racial hygienists came into their own, with institutes for race science and research being established or expanded. They solicited articles by many of the leading American eugenicists for their "scholarly" journals, translated many of their works into German, and gave them wide distribution. The Nazis used these American books and articles to demonstrate that they were not alone in the world in advocating compulsory racial improvement and purity.


A number of American eugenicists happily cooperated. Harry L. Laughlin, who authored the "model" sterilization law for Virginia that was then copied by several other states, saw his proposals explicitly implemented in Germany's 1933 Hereditary Health Law, that prohibited racial intermarriage and codified forced sterilization in the new Germany. As a tribute, the University of Heidelberg awarded Laughlin an honorary degree in 1936, which he enthusiastically accepted.


Even in the late 1930s and early 1940s, some American eugenics publications refused to criticize Nazi race policy in general or legal persecution of the Jews in particular. Some of the leading eugenicists argued that to do so would be to unjustifiably mix science with politics.� (1)

And when the House Un-American Activities saw its leader John Stennis saying 'They Killed our Savior' in the 50s we saw the real nature of the Holocaust (s) continued.

Abortion has been a very contentious issue to say the least. It is just a small part of the overall eugenics agenda and need for proper governance of the resources on our planet. Irving Fisher combines both of the main themes of this book. As a crusader for his Skull & Bones brethren and benefactors like the Rockefellers he actively and openly tried to maintain that eugenics is for the good of the people. We must give credit to the arguments he made. We really should act less like the Nazis who try to silence real ideas as we approach this subject. Things are not simply black and white and a lot of what he said deserves our serious open-minded evaluation. The fact that he is the patron saint of supply-side economics and the father therefore of Reaganomics is all part of the One Pie ideology which the masses have bought because the noble elites are not interested in enabling real empowerment and resource application; including each human being who can create. Yes, CREATE; but they tell us they speak for the CREATOR! We must question these authorities who front for Divine Kings under the guise of ‘The Greater Good’ which has led inexorably to a Manifest Destiny against all life outside their materialistic focus.
It is only through my research on a total new framework of man’s cultural evolution over the last twelve years that I have gradually come to realize that the nobility of what is called the Jew is the same as the noble houses of Scotland and all other European nations. These nations follow the footsteps of Divine Kings and a Manifest Destiny dogma which is deceit and a conspiracy or plan I have dealt with in other books like The Rising Roman Empire so I will try not to cover the same ground too much. They do not always agree and sometimes their front man has to be assassinated as in the case of St. Paul or John F. Kennedy but we will try to stay clear of those highly contentious issues.
The social engineers in many disciplines were involved in both Nazism and Communism and these academic paladins did not integrate or see the bigger picture of those who funded and directed them in most cases. Linguistics played a large role in the formation of the Aryan dogma of a Reich reborn; but it was pure sloppy and ego-driven extrapolation based on very little knowledge as Joseph Campbell has well documented in other books. Linguistics and most specifically Ogham, a root language, is also a part of my research. The symbol of the Gestapo known as the sig-rune like all Runes is from Ogham and other ancient Teutonic or Hyperborean knowledge systems.
Hitler and his handlers studied many myths and sciences to formulate an appealing syncretism of all these things. Social Darwinism and eugenics has a long history in genocidal pogroms against people on earth who have used biowarfare to meet their goals and Revolutions to weed out the nouveau riche on many other occasions. The staging of an enemy against which to create war is a large part of the ‘play both ends against the middle’ and sophisticated Hegelian dialectics or Machiavellian ‘appeals to base human urges’ (The Prince). “Nazi leaders and publicists produced and tailored their central canons with a view to courting many different publics.
The ideological discourse of National Socialism was not confined to the written and spoken word. It was also expressed through symbols, gestures, uniforms, rituals, sounds, and rallies. These nonwritten and nonspoken idioms had a life of their own and many of them took shape before Hitler composed and published Mein Kampf and before senior Nazi leaders delivered their carefully staged homilies.� (1)
This top conventional scholar (Arno Mayer) is quite right to make mention of rituals and sounds, or in other words the Illuminized music of Wagner and legends of Goethe and the Brothers Grimm. Tailoring or propaganda spin should best be done with a view to all ages and interests of the people so music and fairy tales are good and seemingly inoffensive ways to achieve their goals. Goethe and Wagner are main Illuminati members.
Some conspiracy theorists, such as Eric Samuelson, claim that what Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner had in mind was the formation of a master/slave society based upon the principles of eugenics as derived from Plato's Republic. Rhodes, purportedly, was directed to this end by Oxford don, John Ruskin, as a counter to what these theorists perceive to be the proletariat ideology of French Freemasonry. Ruskin is also claimed to be a freemason but he was a top student of Carlyle and the Illuminized Hibernians above them.
Ruskin is one scholar who I have dealt with in relation to Thomas Carlyle and Adam Weishaupt. Weishaupt’s Illuminati funded and founded by the likes of Goethe and Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s William of Hesse is going to be considered in some detail again in this book. I think Ruskin and Weishaupt were flunkies for the Hibernians above the total governance of each nation. I will try to get into both sides of the argument and touch on things far beyond what most ‘conspiracy theorists’ deal with. Skull & Bones is another outgrowth of this plan.
Eugenics is a lot like all the other arrows in the quiver of the social engineer like Francis Fukayama whose book The End of History and The Last Man is a powerful reminder of how much ‘absolute religions’ are mere tool for the elite. In order to design or engineer a quality environment we must have ethics or principles that allow decisions to be made that benefit all life on earth rather than a few elites who operate to benefit their cronies and share a little with their paladins in some Physiocratic ‘trickle down’ approach to the governance and resources or opportunities that humanity has the duty to fulfill according to some over-riding purpose. That purpose might be divine but it must make sense and be commonly apprehended or shared. I happen to think there is an intelligence and collective conscious design. I also think we are part of this design and can make mincemeat or a thorough botchery of it. We are individually responsible for being like gods as Jesus (John 10:34) and all so many adepts have made eloquently apparent. We are part of God and should help she/he/it achieve what is RIGHT.
Is that an elitist attitude? Maybe it is at some point, because I am not one who caters to the destruction of the human gene pool or one who thinks anyone deserves a free ride at the heart of it. That is not to suggest that I think everyone should not be enabled and encouraged far more than has been done in the WASP world of history in the last two millennia and more. I probably share more with Thomas Paine and his New World Order types than I share with bleeding heart naïve do-gooders who seek something they have not fully examined. I think helping babies exist and take food from the mouths of others in India was not a godly or good thing, for example.