Has anyone ever met a "spirt guide" or something of that nature when tripping?There is a good book called "The Inner Guide Meditation"by Edwin Steinbrecher about it.I am just wondering.

Hello Sir,

If you read Bible, the Bible says, The Holy Spirit will guide you in to all truth. Kindly think about this.

Yours
Richard

But the Bible also says : "an eye for an eye"

and we know that is not the way to achieve lasting peace, it only fuels the need for revenge as it is in the book that is supposed to be written by the one you pray to and He wouldnt tell you lies now would He ?

Kindly think about this

Yours
John

No,actually,I like that answer.I am,or used to be,well into tripping.I believe in Jesus Christ,and I wonder if I should consider him as my guide,and that spirit guides could be false.I didn't mean to go this deep on this one,but I thought that it wasn't someone else had thought about,and I am glad that you mentioned it.Back to my original question though,has anyone ever met anything that might have SEEMED like it was their guide,at least?And if I am right in saying that Christ is ALL of our guides,are(what seem like?)spirit guides false?

Hi richard evans!

Yes, I've met a few of my spirit guides. Straight and when using kaneh bosm.

Red Dragon
Raven shaman

Nero was not 'just whistling Dixie' when he said the Christian cult were into cannibalism. It would be more appropriate to call it sex magic and blood sports and the Obscene Ritual of Skull & Bones continues to harvest these elements including the thalami. You might want to read my book The Nos Feratu (fictionalized but based on real experience).

Letters can unlock the akashic and I think I posted one of Daniel Maat's great meditations from his book The Essential Kaballah here - called Unsheathing the Soul. Here is a more neuroscientific piece which I have also posted here before.

PROVOCATION OR BIBLIOMANCY:


“Burgess confirmed that he did use this method and that he believed aleatory composition freed up certain creative tensions that would otherwise remain unexpressed. He suggested that if I had any doubt about the method’s effectiveness, I should try it myself. He was pleased, as well as surprised, by my inquiry, because it was based on a comparatively obscure reference he had made several years earlier in a review in the 'Times Literary Supplement'.


Some months later I encountered a second reference to the aleatory approach. Edward de Bono, a physician and expert in creativity, called the process ‘provocation,’ the introduction of a random word. {See ‘Unsheathing the Soul’ from earlier herein.} ‘The word can be picked from a dictionary with a table of random numbers so that no unconscious selection takes place. Does this mean that any word whatsoever may be used as a provocation with any problem whatsoever? It does. There is no connection (logical) at all between the random word and the problem.’ De Bono referred to his method as ‘lateral thinking’; its purpose, he said, was ‘to produce ideas that are logical in hindsight.’ {Absurd relating in the style of Camus might also apply in a similar construct but we will delve into this ancient techniques or what these ‘experts’ in all their grandiose plagiarization are not even coming close to understanding. If neurosis is defined as ‘abnormal’ and they are ‘normal’; I think it is wise to be ‘crazy’.}


Burgess’s and de Bono’s emphasis on chance and serendipity turns the process upside down. {No it does NOT. Serendipity and synchronicity or other realities just are not fully understood and these people are not aware of much at all. In fact the whole field of psychology still has a lot to learn from Yogananda or other Eastern thought and attunement arts or disciplines.} The writer or the problem solver no longer functions as a master technician, consciously aiming the thinking process in a certain direction for a certain set purpose. {Not unlike the scientists that develop theories and try to fit the results into the pre-conceived notions which is called reductivism or direct inference. This is just one approach that can be useful in the observation of ‘what is’ but when tenured ‘me-too think’ is all the rage it is no wonder people are out of touch with reality.} Now the role becomes that of a gambler who, being dealt a certain hand, must decide on a creative course of action with those cards and only those cards. Both techniques aim at altering perceptions and concepts via the introduction of unexpected, bizarre, and even disorienting associations.


Studies of patients who have undergone ‘split brain’ operations (the separation of the right and left hemispheres) reveal the right hemisphere is superior to its counterpart {The right hemisphere controls the left side of the body and thus when one is left-handed or ‘sinister’ one is more able to integrate.} on the left when it comes to coping with the novel and unfamiliar. This is especially true when there are no clues how to respond. Both aleatory composition and provocation shift the emphasis from the logical—verbal—linear processing style of the left hemisphere to the more holistic style of the right hemisphere, in which logical analysis plays a much smaller part. The right hemisphere may thus be viewed as a ‘jack of all trades, a generalist that addresses new problems until it finds one that fits,’ according to one summary of right and left hemisphere functioning.


At the anatomical level, the right hemisphere is uniquely suited for creativity, {And nurturing and all the things considered feminine as part of the ancient understanding of this in concepts like Yin and Yang.} since it occupies a larger volume in the ‘association cortex,’ where the most complex levels of information processing and integration are carried out. Second, the right hemisphere contains many long fibers that connect widely separated regions; the left hemisphere, in contrast, contains shorter fibers that provide richer interconnections 'within' a specific region.


Innovative drawing and writing techniques and suggestions for improving one’s productivity in business and finance are only some of the fields influenced by the introduction of ‘right-brain thinking’ over the past decade.� (5)