Laz
Mar 10, 2004, 01:00 AM
Does a yogi ever do anything proactively?
If for example; an action can be seen as beneficial to others, does the yogi act, or does he/she just sit back and do nothing?
Guest
Mar 10, 2004, 06:06 AM
a yogi acts for the sake of action and not for the fruit of action.
Laz
Mar 10, 2004, 06:45 AM
Not acting selfishly is a given, but would he act for the benefit of others?
Does that qualify as "for the sake of action"?
Guest
Mar 10, 2004, 07:10 AM
a yogi may appear to act selflessly, and in some instances selfishly, but invariantly the yogi is acting through the will of God. The more the yogi is possessed of the will of God, the greater will be his acts. Thus will you come to know them through their works.
For reference, read the Mahabharata or a concise version of it, the epic poem which contains the Bhagavad Gita as a small part.
Laz
Mar 10, 2004, 07:27 AM
Thanks
ilimow
Mar 22, 2004, 09:32 PM
i believe an yogi doesn't see things in terms of right or wrong and good or bad. this is because the yogi doesnot believe in action. According to an yogi, things are happening, but no one is doing anything. when the yogi does soemthing, there is no mind involved in it. All there is, is awareness of what is happening and spontatneous reactions devoid of thoughts. And since there is no mind involved there is no question of decission which is just another mind construct.
Laz
Mar 22, 2004, 11:51 PM
I like that explanation a lot, it feels more right than the previous response even though it was valid all the same.
Thanks Ilimow
Dan
Mar 24, 2004, 12:56 AM
It sounds to me like the described 'yogi' simply doesn't care. If not caring is tantamount to enlightenment, then sociopathy is the way
Laz
Mar 24, 2004, 01:38 AM
You're right Dan, a yogi neither cares or does not care.
Guest
Mar 24, 2004, 06:58 AM
Ahhhh, to experience the absolute stillness of mind of a yogi and the frenzied becoming that knows no satiety nor weariness, at the same time! That, my friends, is true living.
Guest
Mar 24, 2004, 07:04 AM
Dan, the yogi is detached, but is it right to call this trait sociopathic, or do you mean that it just tends to be associated with sociopathic behavior? I think such detachment can grant the yogi, or whoever else possesses it, a freedom to do anything, which can be both a bane or a boon.
Joesus
Mar 24, 2004, 11:12 AM
Detachment is not the same as being anti social. Once a person taps into the One truth of reality and lives in total surrender to that all action and thought becomes aligned with the will of that.
Just as the universe supports all beliefs and allows man to deny or embrace spirit, a detached man will support the universe in the same way. Without getting involved in forcing any issue, but standing firm as an example to reality. Such as a lighthouse stands in and amongst the differing aspects of the environment without being swayed by the weather, continually shining the light of truth.
Dan
Mar 24, 2004, 11:33 PM
I don't know about 'real' yogis, but I can say that at least one 'yogi' that frequents this board is rather sociopathic. mahahahahaha
Joesus
Mar 25, 2004, 02:24 PM
| QUOTE (Dan @ Mar 25, 07:33 AM) |
| I don't know about 'real' yogis, but I can say that at least one 'yogi' that frequents this board is rather sociopathic. mahahahahaha |
It would be safe to say that if you do not know about real Yogis then you might be projecting an idea about any Yogi.
Smoochies.
Dan
Mar 31, 2004, 01:34 AM
not real, 'real'
get it?
Joesus
Mar 31, 2004, 02:37 AM
Nope!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.