Dan,
Yes, Â I went to a Jungian school, because I thought his view of the world to be head and shoulders above anything else available. Â But, I decided not to be a Jungian, like Nietzsche's desire to re-order all order. Â The internal 'wrestle', not to take my credential was very fierce in the end as the conflict of practicality fought with the desire to not be anything with a title.
Yes, I have practiced what I intended, or rather started to and then found as usual something much different than I had imagined.
In response to talking about the practice and conclusions. Â I am talking about what I have found here, and will continue to until I detect it as inappropriate. Â I went to the ground to conduct these in life studies that also effect me, I have no other forum, other than to write a book, which would freeze a live practice (writing a book puts me into freezing an ongoing practice and then tending to to its defence and writing is not on the list of favorite things to do.)
Since I have no guild to preform in front of, I have no made to order audience. Longwindedly, this that I have found cuts across many disiplines which is not encouraged in science. Â Psychology, brain anatomy, neurophysiology, philosophy, physics, religion, culture studies, psychiatry, mystical studies, entheogens.
Where does one find a forum like this?
Aha! Â Eureka!
John
_________________________________________
Edit: Â I have left the explaination of archetypes out as I have found a different and novel look at them which I will cover seperately. Â What I have found is a whole family of ideas that cannot be covered under one heading. Â The core of what I have found is several tools to explore consciousness with, that, as usual, was under every ones's nose. Â These tools needed a bit of understanding to them. Â They are completely unexceptable to present day science. Â I expect them to be used routinely fifty years in the future.