QUOTE(Joesus @ Apr 18, 2008, 12:56 AM)

Although I can't seem to download the file
The article is available open access from the PNAS website.
This article's methods are similar to the methods I'm incorporating into my studies, which is how I originally knew about the article. I like it because most previous EEG research into meditation has merely shown that people's brain wave's get slower, which is the equivalent of falling asleep. But this is not what meditation is and more happens in meditation than falling asleep. I suppose EEG research had to wait for new methods of EEG analysis to show that there is more going on neurophysiologically during meditation than just slower predominant EEG frequencies. We were stuck with alpha, beta, theta and delta emphasis for a long time, research in the last decade or so is now also starting to focus on gamma frequencies. Gamma synchronous activity is quite interesting, and it seems to fit a lot of requirements for some aspects of consicousness i.e. it's reasonably fast and temporally precise, so it serves as good coding for linking separate parts of the brain together so that we can experience 'things' as one cohesive 'bit'. It may underlie a whole host of experiential phenomena. It may not.