Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Our success is killing us
BrainMeta.com Forum > Philosophy, Truth, History, & Politics > Philosophy
coberst
Our success is killing us

The aims of technology are achieved and our chances for survival are fatally diminished. The fault is not in our technology but in us. The fault lies within human society.

McLuhan made us aware of the fact that technology is an extension of our self. I would say that we and also our ecosystem are both gestalts, a whole, wherein there are complex feedback loops that permit self healing and various means that protect us from our self.

The dictionary defines gestalt as meaning a structure, configuration, or pattern of physical, biological, or psychological phenomena so integrated as to constitute a functional unit with properties not derivable by summation of its parts. When we interfere with the gestalt, i.e. our ecosystem or our self, we are changing some one or some few of the feedback loops that help us maintain equilibrium. Such modifications, if not fully understood, can send the gestalt into a mode wherein equilibrium can no longer be maintained.

In 1919 Ernest Rutherford announced to a shocked world “I have been engaged in experiments which suggest that the atom can be artificially disintegrated. If it is true, it is far greater importance than a war.” Today’s stem-cell research could, in my opinion, be considered as more important than a war and also more important than Rutherford’s research success.

The discussion regarding the advisability of continuing stem-cell research primarily focuses on the religious/political factor and on the technology but there is little or no focus upon the impact that could result to our society beyond its health effects.

We are unwilling or unable to focus on the long-term effects of our technology and thus should put much of it on hold until we gain a better means to evaluate the future implications of our technology.

What do you think about this serious matter?
trojan_libido
If we are destroyed because of our own technology creating an imbalance, then the equilibrium will be restored. Nobel Prize for TL please smile.gif
Flex
QUOTE(trojan_libido @ Nov 08, 2007, 06:16 AM) *

If we are destroyed because of our own technology creating an imbalance, then the equilibrium will be restored. Nobel Prize for TL please smile.gif


HAHA what would you call that, self facilitated evolution?
trojan_libido
A clean slate maybe smile.gif
Flex
QUOTE(trojan_libido @ Nov 09, 2007, 01:42 AM) *

A clean slate maybe smile.gif


Ever the optimist smile.gif
code buttons
You guys should join the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement! They need volunteers:

http://www.vhemt.org/
Rick
QUOTE(code buttons @ Nov 09, 2007, 01:09 PM) *

You guys should join the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement! They need volunteers:

http://www.vhemt.org/

Damn, and I thought I was liberal! Those guys take thinking green to the extreme.
trojan_libido
Haha, I obviously signed up immediately wink.gif
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/ne...rior_coral_reef
Flex
I actually do agree with the idea that people should stop having so damn many kids. Make a global two child rule.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.


Home     |     About     |    Research     |    Forum     |    Feedback  


Copyright BrainMeta. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Last Modified Tue Jan 17 2006 12:39 am