Atheists criticize that Rama – took wine

Rama and Krishna are not imaginary, - they are the absolute truth,
This world is imaginary for God, - the stone bridge in the ocean
Towards Lanka and the immersed – Dwaraka traced now in the sea
Stand as historical proof for truth, - atheists are rigid stones,
No use of preaching to them, - like blow of conch shell before deaf,
Kauravas did not listen Krishna, - even several sages tried to change
Duryodhana, Krishna showed – cosmic vision but every thing was waste.

Atheists criticize that Rama – took wine according to Valmiki Ramayana,
Non-vegetarian food and wine – are allowed for dynasty of Kshatriyas,
Even God follows the tradition of – a community in which He is born,
Following the tradition, - He mixes with the community and slowly
Reforms the community, - it is like following the running bull initially,
To stop it after some steps, initial mixing is essential for preaching.
Same Rama was born as Buddha, - Buddha condemned that food and
Preached non-violence of all – living beings opposing non-vegetarians.
Datta was born in the caste of – Brahmins for whom wine is prohibited,
Still Datta drinks to mislead - devotees from their firm faith on Him,
Datta drinks to help undeserving, – because undeserving can’t be helped
According to law of justice and – He forgets justice by drinking wine.
But these undeserving fellows – criticize Him for drinking the wine!
These atheists should not have – been born as human beings here,
If Datta doesn’t drink wine, - these souls will be born as animals.

what about vodka... brandy.. and bloody mary ?