Under philosophy please consider Analytic Philosophy which helps to shape language we use in a way to be able to think more complexly and evolve from ape into higher organized creatures we potentially are destined to be by the Lord.

This thesis attempts, by way of a case study showing that thought cannot have any content, irreducible substrate, or essence, to substantiate the Madhyamika Buddhist demonstrations that all theses, all philosophy, all science, all views, reduce to foolishness, absurdity, or meaninglessness.

The consequences of this thesis for philosophy are numerous. Firstly this thesis initiates a program of research via reductio ad absurdum argumentation that debunks and invalidates essentialist programs of research in other traditions. Secondly with the necessary truth that thought can not be constituted by any sui generis medium basis, or essence, the phenomenological search via eidetic reduction for the essence of thought is invalidated and untenable. Similarly some characterisations of analytic philosophy are made untenable. Analytic philosophy, in Dummett’s characterisation, gives priority to language over thought. In this tradition by arguing that language is constitutively involved in thought this guarantees that we can analyse philosophically thought by focusing on thoughts mode of expression–because thoughts are formulated and constituted by language. The necessary truth that thoughts are not and cannot be constituted by language (or anything for that matter) means the analytical philosophical tradition of Dummett becomes untenable. Thirdly, as a corollary, what equally becomes untenable is the program of diminishing the ‘thinkable’ by diminishing the range of thought, as instigated, in Orwell’s book Nineteen Eighty-Four, by Ingsoc, with its idea of Newspeak , (where it is assumed, like Dummett’s analytic philosophy, that “… thought is dependant on words� ). Fouthly, a language philosophy of the Sapir-Whorf kind becomes untenable as well. It is a short step from analytical philosophy arguments that thought is constituted by language to the claim that since languages are distinct from each other then there must be distinct thought and ‘ratiocination’. In other words different language users think differently to each other. Fifthly, if we accept on the contrary that Aristotelian logic is no epistemic condition for truth then the whole of philosophy becomes untenable and invalidated. Philosophical texts are tracts which in the main contain arguments for a particular point of view based upon Aristotelian logic (see chapter four). If this logic is not an epistemic condition of truth then the truths these texts discover have in fact no epistemic worth.

Intellectual intercourse, probably more dangerous than anal

you should read deans

Contentless thought: case study in the meaninglessness of all views

where he shows analytic philosophy is bankrupt and ends in self contradcition nonsense

so people why you going to waste your time studying plowing through philosophers volumous tomes to explore their fetish or neurouses let alone to discover what dean says ie they ends in meaninglessness any way

so people why you going to waste your time studying plowing through philosophers volumous tomes to explore their fetish or neurouses let alone to discover what dean says ie they ends in meaninglessness any way

Because we trust and respect Great Western Philosophic Heritage which pulled mankind from mud of misleading and superstitions to power, prosperity, abundance and self-understanding.

this great tradition with enlightenment ideals raped half the earth in imperialism colonialism had two world wars droped A bombs and is now destroying the planet and exploiting the 3rd world
i think you should read dean to see just how vacuous and meaningless your tradition really is

You just told us NOT to read the works of philosophers, because all we are doing is reading into their fetishes (or something to that extent). Why then should we read Dean and his sick perversions?

Is it me or is Nightrover trying to get us to stop everything and go sit under a tree meditating until we realise even thats pointless?

bravo-you do get deans point after all

Any one who thinks/philosophies to much is as some one said imprisioned in their rationality
they must have experienced some trauma to be so preoccupied with thinking out systems-some mental disturbance-Winnicott the psychoanlylist argued thinking was due to trauma
Freud even called it epistemophila - driven by an infantile voyuerism

so people why you going to waste your time studying plowing through philosophers volumous tomes to explore their fetish or neurouses let alone to discover what dean says ie they ends in meaninglessness any way

what do you think?

this great tradition with enlightenment ideals raped half the earth in imperialism colonialism had two world wars droped A bombs and is now destroying the planet and exploiting the 3rd world
i think you should read dean to see just how vacuous and meaningless your tradition really is

Reality may not be meaningless, but no one has found the meaning of reality yet

Eastern tradition is retarded and not effective that is why they suck.

all the shit Hitler brought to Europe and raped it during the WWII came from the East. You see.

Show a man a screwdriver and if he tries to use it as a hammer and it isn't effective it would seem to suck.

It couldn't have been the Western God so it must've been the Eastern God. My God is better than your God...

Lawl, honestly though, I think nightrover has bought into something which will ultimately eat his sanity. Go read a few comics for a while, or watch a disney film.

So why do you insist on sharing your meaningless rambling?

So this topic is meaningless.

The End.

...I guess we will just have to wait and die to figure out the truth...

I guess we will just have to wait and die to figure out the truth...

no one knows what life is

Or the mountains that lead to the gateway if your going south...

Hey is this still on topic?

No, I am intentionally trying to shift from the topic to shift the Hurricane Dean from the initially projected Texas direction. I wonder that nobody cares about that

hey you must work that out any thing i say will be meaningless

dont you think the views of someone who has just eradicated death from the universe might be worth a look

dont you think the views of someone who has just eradicated death from the universe might be worth a look

dont you think the views of someone who has just eradicated death from the universe might be worth a look

logically you cant talk of the essence of death -lacking life -till you tell us what the esence of life is
put up or shut up
tell us what life is
or else deans achieveme

If you yourself were convinced of that, you wouldn't be posting here. You probably woudn't even exist anymore after you realized that your life is not worth living because it's meaningless.

And there one can find the rose-gateway of the Templars' temple.

No, I am intentionally trying to shift from the topic to shift the Hurricane Dean from the initially projected Texas direction. I wonder that nobody cares about that!

you have not understood
i did not say life is meaningless -as that view would end in meaninglessness
i just said every view ends in meaninglessness -even the view that every thing ends in meaninglessness

Does your life have meaning, in your opinion?

meaning ends in meaninglessness
but what i will say is my views end in meaninglessness
and if some ones life lacked meaning all they need to know is that lack of meaning ends in meaninglessnes
some existentialist killed them selves because life had no meaning
dean would say why kill yourself over some view that ends in self-contradiction or meaningless
why be a prisoner of rationality of logic
why let logic lead you to kill yourself or see the world as meaningless when logic it self ends in self-contradiction or meaninglessness
logic is a tyranny which traps people
meaninglessness can free you from that tyrany of logic so that life does not end in meaninglessness

So, we are born to a meaningless existence

i did not say that
but that
to say "existence is meaningless" will end in self-contradiction or meaninglessness

so, existence is not meaningless

unable to determine the significance of them does not mean that they are insignificant: