You don't have to agree with me but just take the time to read tgis and think about your thoughts.

The war was most likely an event that our presidant chose. We didn't have to send our troops over there. Some of them will die, some have. And for what cause? To help other people sort out there problems. All we can to is hope that the US wont send bombs to blow things up like they did to stop another war. Inocent people died when they had nothing to do with what was going on. That's exactly what's going on now. Maybe thats all the US us trying to do is to help the inocent people in Iraq. At least thats what I hope. War turnes things ugly. A war can start from just an argument, where each side has to win. They don't care about anthing else. More people get involved. Once it happens, one side has to give up for it to stop.
People want to bring our troops home, they think that might help stop evrything. It won't. They should have thought about that before they sent our troops there. If we send them home now, more inocent people will die. But if they stay some troops will die. For this argument no side is wrong, now side is write. All it is a lose lose situation.

Saddam was an evil tyrant...but I think we could have went into Iraq in a better way. I am glad we got rid of him..but the question now is... who to replace him? We can't stay there forever......