How the Brain Makes Moral Choices

Study Pinpoints Area Linked to Emotionally Tough Moral Judgments

By Miranda Hitti
WebMD Medical News

Reviewed By Louise Chang, MD

March 21, 2007 -- Scientists may have pinpointed the area in the brain where morality and emotions clash in dicey situations.

The area is the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPC), report the researchers.

Michael Koenigs, PhD, of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, worked on the study while on staff in the neurology division of the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.

Koenigs and colleagues studied six people who suffered VMPC damage as adults. The VMPC is involved in emotional responses and social emotions such as compassion, shame, and guilt, Koenigs' team notes.

For comparison, the researchers also looked at 12 healthy adults with no brain damage and 12 adults with brain damage that didn't affect the VMPC or other emotion-related areas.

In the study, participants read fictional scenarios that presented dilemmas, such as sacrificing one person's life to save the lives of others.

For example, one scenario featured a runaway boxcar careening towards a crowd. Study participants were asked if they would push one person off a bridge to save five other people from the boxcar.

Those with VMPC damage were the most likely to agree with that action and similar choices in other personal, emotional, life-and-death scenarios. They also made such decisions faster than other participants.

However, these VMPC-damaged participants handled impersonal, low-stakes scenarios much like the other study participants.

The researchers aren't calling the VMPC-damaged participants cold or immoral. But they say the findings support the theory that the VMPC is involved in making personal, emotional, intense moral decisions.

SOURCES: Keonigs, M. Nature, March 22, 2007; early online edition. News release, Nature.

it sure sounds like the researchers are calling people with VMPC-damage both cold and immoral.

It sounds to me that the VMPC-damaged people are making the right choices quicker and easier. Sacrificing one to save five is a very difficult choice, but it's the correct one from a moral viewpoint.

Yeah, it doesn't seem cold and immoral to me to make that choice. I can see why someone would hesitate-- they'd feel like they were personally causing the death of the one person, and they actually would be-- but it's the right decision to make.