First off, what is with people waving their large words around on this discussion? Extremely vague...
Enki:
QUOTE
Intuition is a great thing and what it is, is still unknown. We have interesting suppositions but there is no unified theory explaining all the phenomena related with the intuition.
And what Intelligence is should be possible asked in CIA, NSA and MI6, but my experience shows that they have no idea about what it is.
And if without jokes, the Intelligence is a self congruent dynamic database based on biological data storage complex structure, known as brain [which interacts with surrounding media via vary various forms of communication, possibly even telepathic, and possibly pinging info all over the universe], which is ordered by flexible categories undergoing constant process of transformations, data verifications, key generations, self assembling systemization and data growing, some people hope/think that it preserves after brain destruction in the frozen light and/or as a mirror alive object in a parallel quantized space.
Saying that intelligence is self congruent doesn't seem meaningful at all to me. A dynamic database based on biologically [manipulated] data storage complex structure, eh? That seems more clear. It reminds me of the many different types of proposed AI systems. Some evolve with time, some use various "learning" algorithms. This also reminds me of development of intelligence from the point of birth, and how different experiences may affect different thinking styles.
I understand that you mean the way neurons, synapses, etc. of the brain organize and reorganize observed information, and the information itself, plays a role in determining intelligence.
Your statements about telepathy and mysticism reminds me of the tinfoil hat type

(And, coincidently, my own screen name, even though I am not that type.)
You start getting pretty ambiguous with key generations and the brain destruction statements, at which point I have no idea what you are talking about

And, by the way, the intel referred to in secret organizations is not the same as what we are talking about here, it is unrelated, and thus your alluding to them is off-topic.
Now Joesus, were you joking? I truthfully cannot tell if you are sincere with your tactics or are cleverly posing them.
QUOTE
[..] all primordial substance is spirit; that matter is spirit moving at a lower rate of vibration, becoming, as one master expressed it, a coagulum.
Is that a fact? (My question is rhetorical.)
What you have in your post is what I would describe as fantastical emotionalism. If one wants to logically reduce these ideas, instead of supposing such appealing notions, one should better think about what really consciousness, mind, omni-, benevolence and malevolence, objectivity and subjectivity, and the like are in actuality.
Think about this tongue twister: Our own thinking of how our thinking is is determined by how our own thinking works. Recursion is a helluvah idea.