QUOTE(maximus242 @ Jul 12, 04:07 PM)

It has often been a topic of debate, what humans 'are'. Religion often tells us that humans are above animals, science often tells us we are the animals. But one remarkable trait that humans show that is diffrent from their counterpart animals is that they do not have a circle of life ideology.
Your observation of structure is promising. Was it a conscious thought or was an instinct ?
QUOTE
Humans simply destroy or exhume whatever is in their path and move onto another area, they do not balance things out with the ecosystem. Their is seemingly only one organism that Humans share this unique quality with, a virus.
Hard to be balanced when we are in a hierarchal paradigm. We are struggling to create a rounder world. When we realize it, it will get easier by way of identifying our goal.
QUOTE
Will humans of the future simply move from planet to planet, as a virus moves from body to body until the source dies and the virus/human moves onto another?
If we don't morph the structure, probably. The key benefit of completing the balanced capitalist model is not so much in the amount of wealth that can be created and distributed according to more accessable opportunity for each individual, but the greatest benefit is in
WHAT is produced and consumed, which is currently supply driven.
What distinguishes us from animals is that we can "fall" and get back up. The animals play within the circle of life based on instinct. We can only do this on conscious thought, which may well be a "back-up" to instinct that we may have lost. In some respects , science and theology (distinct from religion) can both be right.
The script is already written. There is nothing new under the sun.