QUOTE(dattaswami @ Apr 24, 05:22 PM)

Lord in human form suffers for His devotees
The saint asked that the human incarnation should not undergo pain when the sins of His devotees are transferred on to Himself. The Lord certainly has the power of Maya to avoid the pain during suffering the sins of the devotees. But that will be cheating the Lord of Justice who is Himself. It is violation of His own constitution as Judge. You fine your son as Judge and as father you pay the fine. Here you should really pay the fine. You should not manage as if you paid the fine. Then you are cheating your own department and your self being the Head of that department. Jesus experienced all the pain in the crucification. Unless the pain is experienced the sin will not pacify.
bear with me, code...

Don't you think that...
When the lord is fined for the pain of his human incarnation, as the union of Judge and son that is a departmental oversight and the father as father of the son should pay the fine. Surely the son has no earning potential, and couldn't afford to pay the fine in any case. It is self-evident that no Father should violate his son's constitution as Judge, nor those of his devotees (though some catholic cardinals might beg to differ). But to pacify the sins of the son, the father must experience the fine, as he is the Lord of Justice and himself and fine. Perhaps not as fine as Maya though. Maya is damn fine. Anyway, when the father is violated by the son's pacification, then he must pay the fine, that's pacified and manageable, and that's fine. Fine as in fine, not as in 'fine'.
At this juncture I think it would be apt to quote one of the most quotable men of this century:
"I believe that human beings and fish can live in harmony."
- W.
Oh, and
"Mmmmm..... spam...."
- Homer