Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: What is God?
BrainMeta.com Forum > Philosophy, Truth, History, & Politics > Philosophy > What is God?
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4
Enki
QUOTE(Lindsay @ Jul 08, 10:01 AM) *


The G stands for the moral goodness and core values possible in life, and basic to all the great religions; Ø stands for the order found in all of nature, which is governed by the laws of science and mathematics. Break the laws of science and there are consequences, often even deadly ones. D stands for the design and beauty found in nature, and the destiny towards which all life seems to be moving.



I am amassed. I am ready to murmur, really. My respects, indeed.

But may I add a bit of criticism? Thank you.
In other words Virtuous Numerical Simulation (VNS). Pythagorean approach.
On my mental screen the poster flashes “Find Your Virtues in Matrix Son”.

I think Democracy is much better. That is why in my opinion Great Old Democrate (or Demon [one who knows]) is much better.

The Republic of People under spiritual guidance of the Republic of Heavens!

Guest
Have you found God ?
Enki
QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 08, 03:06 PM) *

Have you found God ?


What do you want?
Guest
Enki,
What do I want ?
To wake you up, to make you more aware, to make you look inside yourselves...
To make you realize that it is essential to find God, not just speculate about Him. We won´t find God by talking.
Lindsay
QUOTE
name='Enki' date='Jul 08, 10:58 AM' post='67059']
....But may I add a bit of criticism?
I think Democracy is much better.
As one who believes in dialogue rather than debate, I like and accept your constructive criticism. Good idea: D now democratically refers to "we the people".
Enki
QUOTE(Lindsay @ Jul 09, 05:16 AM) *

QUOTE
name='Enki' date='Jul 08, 10:58 AM' post='67059']
....But may I add a bit of criticism?
I think Democracy is much better.
As one who believes in dialogue rather than debate, I like and accept your constructive criticism. Good idea: D now democratically refers to "we the people".


Thank you very much.
Enki
QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 09, 03:30 AM) *

Enki,
What do I want ?
To wake you up, to make you more aware, to make you look inside yourselves...
To make you realize that it is essential to find God, not just speculate about Him. We won´t find God by talking.


I see, now I understand. You are preaching something. You know it is really very funny.

I will highly appreciate if you f*** *ff and find someone else to preach your sh*t to .
maximus242
Lets look down the line of the most recent Brain Meta preachers..

1. dattaswami - worst of them all, he came like the plague and left destruction in his wake.
2. OnFire - Arrogant, close minded, does not like to be contradicted, pretty much thought he knew everything and was smarter than everyone.
3. Do we have a third preacher on the way? could the illusive 'guest' be our next preacher? He certainly makes the Kitty Cat angry (Enki)
Enki
I suspect I know who that Guest is.
Lindsay
QUOTE(maximus242 @ Jul 09, 08:35 AM) *

Lets look down the line of the most recent Brain Meta preachers..

1. dattaswami - worst of them all, he came like the plague and left destruction in his wake.
2. OnFire - Arrogant, close minded, does not like to be contradicted, pretty much thought he knew everything and was smarter than everyone.
3. Do we have a third preacher on the way? could the illusive 'guest' be our next preacher? He certainly makes the Kitty Cat angry (Enki)
In my humble opinion, this brings up a very serious question: What is the best way to receive--note the choice of words-- "preachers" who feel that they speak for an infallible "god"?

BTW, are all "preachers" negative characters who deserve to be, and should be, dissed?
Enki
Any form of religious preaching contains anti-Scientific elements.
All the preachers pretend that they know much than those who are being preached to.
Preachers claim that they spread the words of God.

In true they linguistically Install into human brain self-unzipping Installation package of some specific program designed for very certain purposes by very certain parties for extremely practical means having ABSOLUTLY no relation with salvation of human soul!
Guest
QUOTE(Enki @ Jul 09, 09:19 PM) *

Any form of religious preaching contains anti-Scientific elements.
All the preachers pretend that they know much than those who are being preached to.
Preachers claim that they spread the words of God.

In true they linguistically Install into human brain self-unzipping Installation package of some specific program designed for very certain purposes by very certain parties for extremely practical means having ABSOLUTLY no relation with salvation of human soul!

Life comes at you and you decide what isn't your life and what is, that simple.
Someone who has the potential to merge with all of it doesn't separate it into good and evil, just the reflection of beliefs which lead to the opportunity to stretch the mind beyond victims and those who prey on victims.
You get to play it any way you wish, so why decide for others how they can play it?
Life is much more than a personal jihad pissed off puss. Expressing your short temper only shows your feelings which you think are important to someone else because they are to you.
I doubt there is anyone losing any sleep over it. I'll bet you aren't either.
Anyway those who need to make a point to defend their beliefs need to create labels to mark their territory in hopes of protecting it from the things they don't accept or understand.
You preach your philosophy of having others leave you the fu*k alone and others preach their philosophy of trying to change others for their own good.
the moral differentiation is only according to the mores of the majority.
The north against the south, the communists against democratic process and the beliefs of universal law against personal beliefs in individuality and victimization.
Humanity still seems to need to separate the universe into good and bad otherwise it would have to face the internal conflict within the personal opposing thoughts of fear and love.
Hey Hey
Let's calm down everyone. We are all entitled to our opinions. Good arguments against are always better than flaming. My old PhD supervisor used to say, "Lose your temper, lose the argument."
Guest
Any person who advocates something can be called a preacher: a priest, a politician, a scientist, a writer, a reporter, a salesmam, and so on.
Our world is full of preachers -- take news media, take any movie, any musical concert, any fashion show, any book -- they all preach something.
Jesus Christ himself was a great preacher, and set the example for the whole Christian era.
Guest
QUOTE(Hey Hey @ Jul 10, 12:23 AM) *

Let's calm down everyone. We are all entitled to our opinions. Good arguments against are always better than flaming. My old PhD supervisor used to say, "Lose your temper, lose the argument."

If you are arguing, you've already lost.

But then again what the hell are you supposed to win?
If it's personal satisfaction and you are already not satisfied, or...if your satisfaction can be so easily removed then whatever it is you hope to gain is not so great if it can be easily threatened or taken away.

Anyone seeking to gain something from an argument or who can so easily lose something, should reconsider their life...
Enki
QUOTE(Hey Hey @ Jul 10, 12:23 AM) *

Let's calm down everyone. We are all entitled to our opinions. Good arguments against are always better than flaming. My old PhD supervisor used to say, "Lose your temper, lose the argument."


Hi Hey Hey, nice to see you.

Arguments are used to discuss something interesting with interesting people.

But when someone starts to recommend to you "to look inside yourself", then the arguments step aside and ... smile.gif
Hey Hey
QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 10, 05:40 PM) *

QUOTE(Hey Hey @ Jul 10, 12:23 AM) *

Let's calm down everyone. We are all entitled to our opinions. Good arguments against are always better than flaming. My old PhD supervisor used to say, "Lose your temper, lose the argument."

If you are arguing, you've already lost.

But then again what the hell are you supposed to win?
If it's personal satisfaction and you are already not satisfied, or...if your satisfaction can be so easily removed then whatever it is you hope to gain is not so great if it can be easily threatened or taken away.

Anyone seeking to gain something from an argument or who can so easily lose something, should reconsider their life...

I noticed you changed one of your previous posts, but Shawn keeps a record of everything. As I said, calm down. And do note, that MOST common definitions for the term "argument" relate to the provision of substantial evidence to strongly defend a position. Examples are given below. So why does arguing mean that you've already lost? I suggest you analyze the meaning of terms well before you decide to go all out in attempting to criticize them. But I do understand that being advised to 'calm down' might be embarrassing and it is sometimes difficult to accept that one is out of order. But we are all grown ups here (?) so lets get back to a meaningful discussion. (Hint, I'm moderating here).

Definition:

[noun] a fact or assertion offered as evidence that something is true; "it was a strong argument that his hypothesis was true"
Synonyms: statement

[noun] a contentious speech act; a dispute where there is strong disagreement; "they were involved in a violent argument"
Synonyms: controversy, contention, contestation, disputation, disceptation, tilt, arguing

[noun] a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal; "the argument over foreign aid goes on and on"
Synonyms: ation, debate

[noun] a summary of the subject or plot of a literary work or play or movie; "the editor added the argument to the poem"
Synonyms: literary

[noun] a variable in a logical or mathematical expression whose value determines the dependent variable; if f(x)=y, x is the independent variable
Enki
Well, let us forget about that unknown Guest and go on.

Let us return to the God related subject.
Hey Hey
QUOTE(Enki @ Jul 10, 09:21 PM) *

QUOTE(Hey Hey @ Jul 10, 12:23 AM) *

Let's calm down everyone. We are all entitled to our opinions. Good arguments against are always better than flaming. My old PhD supervisor used to say, "Lose your temper, lose the argument."


Hi Hey Hey, nice to see you.

Arguments are used to discuss something interesting with interesting people.

But when someone starts to recommend to you "to look inside yourself", then the arguments step aside and ... smile.gif

Fair enough. But please, we can all U-turn, shake hands and get back to the issues of the discussion, whatever they were.
Hey Hey
QUOTE(Enki @ Jul 10, 09:25 PM) *

Well, let us forget about that unknown Guest and go on.

Let us return to the God related subject.

We're overlapping now, so I'll leave you to the discussion. Have a good time, all.
Enki
QUOTE(Hey Hey @ Jul 10, 12:28 PM) *

QUOTE(Enki @ Jul 10, 09:25 PM) *

Well, let us forget about that unknown Guest and go on.

Let us return to the God related subject.

We're overlapping now, so I'll leave you to the discussion. Have a good time, all.


Thank you very much.
Guest
QUOTE
MOST common definitions for the term "argument" relate to the provision of substantial evidence to strongly defend a position. Examples are given below.
Definition:

[noun] a fact or assertion offered as evidence that something is true; "it was a strong argument that his hypothesis was true"
Synonyms: statement

assertion:noun
: the act of asserting; also : DECLARATION, AFFIRMATION
as·sert
1 : to state or declare positively and often forcefully or aggressively
2 a : to demonstrate the existence of <assert his manhood
Hypothesis:1 a : an assumption or concession made for the sake of argument b : an interpretation of a practical situation or condition taken as the ground for action
2 : a tentative assumption made in order to draw out and test its logical or empirical consequences
3 : the antecedent clause of a conditional statement
HYPOTHESIS implies insufficient evidence to provide more than a tentative explanation

The need to assert ones self in an argument is often a defensive measure to protect what one has to lose. If something can be taken away or needs to be argued for then it is vulnerable and the position one stands in to protect is not a winning position. If you need to win something because it is not yours already then you are in a position of not having it. You have not gained anything nor do you have anything. You need to win and so you have already assumed the lost position by seeking to change it to a win.
QUOTE

[noun] a contentious speech act; a dispute where there is strong disagreement; "they were involved in a violent argument"
Synonyms: controversy, contention, contestation, disputation, disceptation, tilt, arguing

If violence ensues there is no peaceful resolve, you have lost already because what you need to protect by violent action wasn't stable enough to hold its position on it's own.
You cannot win something that doesn't prevail on its own merit. You might hypnotize yourself by creating a belief that your ideal changes from being flimsy to solid, but that is just your belief.
QUOTE

[noun] a discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal; "the argument over foreign aid goes on and on"
Synonyms: ation, debate

Are we discussing argument or debate? Do you want to insist they are the same according to your previous examples?
QUOTE

[noun] a summary of the subject or plot of a literary work or play or movie; "the editor added the argument to the poem"
Synonyms: literary

This doesn't apply to this discussion as a definition of an argument by the previous examples. .
QUOTE

[noun] a variable in a logical or mathematical expression whose value determines the dependent variable; if f(x)=y, x is the independent variable

This only applies if you insist the the discussions points to a variable such as belief by the majority. A variable is something that seeks resolve through deduction not force, or the assertion to make it so. Does a variable become real by forcing it to be so? By arguing it into reality.
Let's not be stupid and follow exact definitions without really thinking about what it is we are immersiing ourselves in. Human nature doesn't have to be so ignorant of reality to make these types of assumptions

QUOTE
So why does arguing mean that you've already lost?


Simple logic according to your definitions. If you need to assert yourself to bring forth and impress a truth then you are standing in ground that is not self evident but in ground that is wouthout stability until you come to the decision or experience thru argument that it is stable. You have already lost before you have won.
QUOTE

I suggest you analyze the meaning of terms well before you decide to go all out in attempting to criticize them.

I suggest you forget about your fear of being criticized and set yourself free by allowing all thought to exist without fear of your feeling and belief being taken away. No one can take anything from you that you won't let go of or don't have a stable grip on.
QUOTE
But I do understand that being advised to 'calm down' might be embarrassing and it is sometimes difficult to accept that one is out of order. But we are all grown ups here (?) so lets get back to a meaningful discussion. (Hint, I'm moderating here).

Are you really moderating or are you letting your personal feelings lead you into making assumptions?


Enki
I suggest to stop this absurd quarrel and return to the discussion on nature of the God!

To the Guest:

I asked you "what do you want?" You wrote that I need to "look inside myself". I explained to you in a very definite manner that personally I do not have any desire to discuss with you anything on this subject as I do not like such form of preaching. I think I have put extremely firm point in the conversation. I understand that your aim is to divert the flow of very interesting conversation which was initiated above and in the other topic related with God thematic. I understand the roots of your motivation very well. Such people as you will not be able to divert extremely important conceptual progress introduced into the nature of the God (for those who like careful reading).

The mankind will progress significantly in understanding of the nature of God (at least the well educated its segment) and some secrets of the Great Old Democrate will be revealed (if not already revealed in a specific way to a group of respected Gentlemen, just like it was done many years ago for Ben, George, John and Tom, Numa Pompilius, Particles, and other interesting and honorable gentlemen).

You possibly do not understand well that one page text even one paragraph is sufficient to uncover secrets which some selfish people were hiding for centuries with utmost care. The world has changed. There are secrets in Narnia which the Witch does not know. laugh.gif
Guest
QUOTE
I suggest to stop this absurd quarrel and return to the discussion on nature of the God!

Do you not see God here in these discussions? If not then maybe you should expand yourself a bit and go beyond the need to see quarreling and just witness creation unfold as you believe it to be, and mostly what you don't want it to be. You may get some insight as to what guest suggested in going inward.
Hey Hey
QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 11, 05:12 AM) *

QUOTE
I suggest to stop this absurd quarrel and return to the discussion on nature of the God!

Do you not see God here in these discussions? If not then maybe you should expand yourself a bit and go beyond the need to see quarreling and just witness creation unfold as you believe it to be, and mostly what you don't want it to be. You may get some insight as to what guest suggested in going inward.

All 'guests' might care to give themselves a name in order that we can see with whom we are communicating when there are >1 'guests'. You do not have to register, just remember to give your chosen name when posting.

I agree with Enki about getting back to the topic. The last post was diversionary only, and its content is merely intended to continue to attempt to win the personality orientated argument that occurred. I will end the topic if contributers are not prepared to resume the original theme.
Guest
Do we still believe that we can discover the nature of God by discussion ?

maitreya
Guest
QUOTE
All 'guests' might care to give themselves a name in order that we can see with whom we are communicating when there are >1 'guests'. You do not have to register, just remember to give your chosen name when posting.
As long as you leave it as an option that guests do not have to register, expect anonymity.
More to the point, if you continue to include and exclude by favor of emotional attachment you will never really know god other than through the personal feelings attached to belief.
QUOTE

I agree with Enki about getting back to the topic. The last post was diversionary only, and its content is merely intended to continue to attempt to win the personality orientated argument that occurred.

No, that is simply your perception. Unfortunately you don't seem to want to grasp the extent of God and its presence in all things.
QUOTE
I will end the topic if contributers are not prepared to resume the original theme.
God is a wrathful God...
Well that's one way to press the issue that this discussion is an argument, and how to win by creating a rule of discussion. (setting boundaries of what is allowed as the subject matter of God)

Remember the spanish inquisition!! wink.gif

You find God where you expect to find God, anything else is of course absurd. dry.gif

I would suggest in assigning a moderator, when moderating a topic, the moderator be an expert on the the subject matter before setting boundaries on what isn't appropriate to the realization of god in iintellectual understanding and experience. And that the moderator remove him/herself from the subject matter if personally invested in the direction of the content relating to the subject matter.
Enki
QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 11, 09:15 AM) *


God is a wrathful God...
Well that's one way to press the issue that this discussion is an argument, and how to win by creating a rule of discussion. (setting boundaries of what is allowed as the subject matter of God)

Remember the spanish inquisition!! wink.gif



As I see we have here a person from an organization similar to Opus Dei.

Let ME personally inform you that the Good God favors discussions on this forum and that He does not set any boundaries related with the discussions on the subject concerning God.

Moreover, He = The Great Old Democrate, personally asked ME (while we were drinking a cup of tea in the Invisible College in the early morning) to inform you personally that if you continue to preach here in a way you preach, then you personally will get to know what is the WRATH you were speculating about above.

So consider this as a message from God to you personally delivered via Enki (a modest person from a far away country).
Enki
I decided to quote myself from other segments of the forum to get the Guest to realize that the Greatest reformation of Christian Religion as well as other religions of this world is expected to be accomplished soon.

Let me also inform the Guest that the process cannot be stopped even by the Spanish Inquisition he was refereeing to.

The Republic of People will be established under the spiritual guidance of the Republic of Heavens! That will initiate 1000 (and maybe more) years peace!

QUOTE(Enki @ Jul 06, 10:47 AM) *

QUOTE(Lindsay @ Jul 06, 07:17 AM) *

QUOTE(Enki @ Jul 06, 12:41 AM) *

......I heard that YHVA is used as well. Is not it? The God has many names. YHVH is frequent too, as well as YHWA, YHWH etc.
I think, if it is a signature, it should has very simple explanation.
As I understand it: It is related to the Hebrew verb for 'to be'. This fits in with what I am saying in my signature, below. GØD--the highest good, as LOVE, is BEING, not a being.
How do you understand it? Give us your thoughts.


You see, one can give quite different explanations to those abbreviations.

I think it is quite wrong to concentrate only on Hebrew as a source of reference, especially when we are talking about such a complex category as the God is.

If we suppose that the God is an Omnipresent and very wise creature, then he should consider the reality and the all languages as a part of a united realm of the God, where He is omnipresent (in some way or another).

Let us for a while discard very questionable concept that He is All-Mighty, but concentrate on supposition that he is Omnipresent or Quasi-Omnipresent and can change something in this world but not instantaneously (God exist here and there from time to time [Like Aslan in Narnia comes and goes somewhere …]).

In view of that the well known abbreviation, from point of view of God, can abbreviate words in English rather than in Hebrew: you never know what God himself was meaning under that abbreviation, when was answering to Moses question “What is your name?”

Imagine that you landed on an island and a local would ask you “What is your name?” you had to certainly say “I am Lindsay”. The local would just memorize your name Lindsay but put it down using his alphabet. So you never know what YHVA, YHWA, YHVH, YHWH means in true. If the Universe is a great cryptogram like Sir Isaac Newton was supposing, then abbreviation can mean anything if God has a sense of humor. wink.gif

It may sound quite absurd because English came along as a language during the last one thousand years while in contrast Hebrew came along many thousand years ago. But let us agree that from point of view of the God the game with time and letters is a quite possible thing (at least in the divine World Simulation Software). And if to consider the abbreviation like a pattern existing in the brain, then the languages does not matter, especially when the meaning is quite unknown and secret.
(!) Besides He can replace the abbreviations and modify the languages to fit the abbreviations in a way suitable for Him (especially if to look at the matter from point of view of the Keys and Clues).

E.g. the word God can be referred as the following abbreviation Great Old Demon (or Democrate). One can state that God himself, as a person having a good sense of humor, have encrypted interesting secrets in interesting places. In the same way, if YHVA, YHWA, YHVH, YHWH is a signature, then you can in the same way suppose that Y means “Yours” so frequent at the end of ordinary letters. Why not? Why not if we deal with God? Certainly the person fitting to such kind of abbreviation cannot be considered to be a reincarnation of God even if he coincidentally was born on 25 December.

E.g. like words God and Good differ by one letter. But does it mean something? If you reverse the word God you will get Dog. Accidental coincidence or the counsel of magicians while inventing Latin and later English languages managed to encrypt something quite interesting?

The game of words. But the game with words is a game with the consciousness. So those who play with words play with human consciousness. Can we suppose that God likes to play in that Game? I think we do not have any ground to say that He does not play in that game. wink.gif


And this one

QUOTE(Enki @ Jul 06, 11:35 AM) *

QUOTE(maximus242 @ Jul 06, 11:12 AM) *

Intresting stuff, coinicidences or truths? Can one even define what it means to be omnipotent?


Who knows maybe the true God is very weak from human point of view, but as he is wise and omnipresent he changes the world by initiating certain very weak bifurcations (fluctuations) in needed places by applying few force and getting maximal effect (Chaos control). From that point of view God masters (operates) 0.0000 …0001 segment of the function of events probability.
So from that point of view He is Quasi-All-Mighty. I mean that on short time distances he not so Mighty , but on long time distances that guy can crush any powerful Empire and rise new one from the Dust.
Just like the Power of 1/f noise. It describes very slow process with growing spectral power along with decreasing frequency (increasing time period). wink.gif

Quite funny, I read somewhere on internet that a guy described 1/f noise as 1/freemasonry chaos. Funny is not it? smile.gif


So in the same way the God can construct new great City and great Democratic Republics.

I heard that the God is planning to construct a new city in an interesting place and looks for good free masters who have time, honor, money, wisdom and desire to facilitate the Project.

As I said before:

The roses to grow should be planted in a proper soil, in a proper place protected from winds, in a sunny shiny site near a spring of pure waters.

But sometimes, when one appears in a land of stones, one should cultivate the stones, build aqueducts, plant orchards and forests and create places with proper roofs where the roses can be grown. So to cultivate the stones one needs to educate masons to build the aqueducts, tillers to pant orchards and forests and tilers to make the roofs. Sometimes the masons, tillers and tilers abandon their work and do not follow to their vocation, betray their teacher and crave for money constructing something for quite other purposes for a quite other Selfish gentleman. In that case the Good gardener, who wanted to plant the roses, becomes very sad and departs to other lands and the roses start to blossom in other places for other lands. And the masons, tillers and tillers who betrayed the Good gardeners are getting eternally enslaved by the Selfish gentlemen.

But the Horn of the Great Old Democrate can wake them all up and free them from the chains.
Enki
And a small additional addendum for the unknown Guest:

You should accept that many gentlemen on this forum are much better aware about the nature of God that you are.
And who knows maybe between the lines you may suddenly note the eyes of the God looking at you with hope to grasp your attention.

I should accept that the last sentence is written in a mood of preaching. I am sorry for that. smile.gif
Guest
QUOTE
You should accept that many gentlemen on this forum are much better aware about the nature of God that you are.

I'm very much aware of what most know but unfortunately do not live.
QUOTE

And who knows maybe between the lines you may suddenly note the eyes of the God looking at you with hope to grasp your attention.

Have no fear, God is here. cool.gif
QUOTE
I should accept that the last sentence is written in a mood of preaching.
Noted and recognized, as were the previous sermons
QUOTE
I am sorry for that.

You say yes yes yes but your eyes say no no no.. tongue.gif
Enki
QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 11, 11:17 PM) *

QUOTE
And who knows maybe between the lines you may suddenly note the eyes of the God looking at you with hope to grasp your attention.

Have no fear, God is here. cool.gif


Of course, no doubt about. tongue.gif

QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 11, 11:17 PM) *

QUOTE
I should accept that the last sentence is written in a mood of preaching.
Noted and recognized, as were the previous sermons
QUOTE
I am sorry for that.

You say yes yes yes but your eyes say no no no.. tongue.gif


Oh no, you don’t say so! I am very honest cat. cool.gif
project -2501
QUOTE(Enki @ Jul 09, 09:19 PM) *


Preachers claim that they spread the words of God.

In true they linguistically Install into human brain self-unzipping Installation package of some specific program designed for very certain purposes by very certain parties for extremely practical means having ABSOLUTLY no relation with salvation of human soul!


I am very interested in what you are saying here, could you possible elaborate? smile.gif
code buttons
QUOTE(Enki @ Jul 12, 09:27 AM) *

QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 11, 11:17 PM) *

QUOTE
And who knows maybe between the lines you may suddenly note the eyes of the God looking at you with hope to grasp your attention.

Have no fear, God is here. cool.gif


Of course, no doubt about. tongue.gif

QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 11, 11:17 PM) *

QUOTE
I should accept that the last sentence is written in a mood of preaching.
Noted and recognized, as were the previous sermons
QUOTE
I am sorry for that.

You say yes yes yes but your eyes say no no no.. tongue.gif


Oh no, you don’t say so! I am very honest cat. cool.gif


What the HELL, Enki!!! Here I was, thinking you were some kind of real smart scientist from that side of the pond, a journey man, a time traveler!... Turns out your delusions regarding your religious beLIEves have gotten a good part of your otherwise brilliant gray matter! Need to get back to basics, journey man: What's on the other side of your window, Enki? Reality of delusion?
Enki
QUOTE(code buttons @ Jul 12, 03:45 PM) *

QUOTE(Enki @ Jul 12, 09:27 AM) *

QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 11, 11:17 PM) *

QUOTE
And who knows maybe between the lines you may suddenly note the eyes of the God looking at you with hope to grasp your attention.

Have no fear, God is here. cool.gif


Of course, no doubt about. tongue.gif

QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 11, 11:17 PM) *

QUOTE
I should accept that the last sentence is written in a mood of preaching.
Noted and recognized, as were the previous sermons
QUOTE
I am sorry for that.

You say yes yes yes but your eyes say no no no.. tongue.gif


Oh no, you don’t say so! I am very honest cat. cool.gif


What the HELL, Enki!!! Here I was, thinking you were some kind of real smart scientist from that side of the pond, a journey man, a time traveler!... Turns out your delusions regarding your religious beLIEves have gotten a good part of your otherwise brilliant gray matter! Need to get back to basics, journey man: What's on the other side of your window, Enki? Reality of delusion?



1. Well, thank you for having good opinion about me before, I am sorry that the moon has other side as well. But I think all should be studied experimentally (even the God related aspects, if He (or They) do exits (does exist) of course).
2. An interesting usage of the word believe: beLIEve, … excelsior! Very shrewd indeed.
3. On the other side of the pond, on the other side of the reality window, covered by the delusions there is a great secret covered by another secret, which must be kept in secret that there is such a secret to keep.

You did not like my very primitive WM I introduced for you here http://brainmeta.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=13285&st=30#

I thought it will be an excellent demonstration of the power of the WM. Those who will read that passage will never forget it. That is very old scientific magic. smile.gif

I will think about your recommendations to get back to the basics.
Enki
QUOTE(project -2501 @ Jul 12, 01:58 PM) *

QUOTE(Enki @ Jul 09, 09:19 PM) *


Preachers claim that they spread the words of God.

In true they linguistically Install into human brain self-unzipping Installation package of some specific program designed for very certain purposes by very certain parties for extremely practical means having ABSOLUTLY no relation with salvation of human soul!


I am very interested in what you are saying here, could you possible elaborate? smile.gif


I will catch some free time by Sunday and will come back to the forum to elaborate.
project-2501


Thanks, I have been studying the techniques used by preachers and I think they used some sort of mass hypnotism to swindle the poor masses into giving them money! Damn televangelists!
Guest
QUOTE(project-2501 @ Jul 13, 05:14 AM) *

Thanks, I have been studying the techniques used by preachers and I think they used some sort of mass hypnotism to swindle the poor masses into giving them money! Damn televangelists!

Do you believe you can be hypnotized against your will?
Guest
QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 13, 08:56 AM) *

QUOTE(project-2501 @ Jul 13, 05:14 AM) *

Thanks, I have been studying the techniques used by preachers and I think they used some sort of mass hypnotism to swindle the poor masses into giving them money! Damn televangelists!

Do you believe you can be hypnotized against your will?

Maybe some study in hypnotism is in order.
project-2501
No i dont think you can get hypnotized against your will, most of the audience for these 'preachers' are willing hypnotized as they want to believe it. However suibliminal messages are another thing.
Guest
QUOTE(project-2501 @ Jul 13, 09:28 AM) *

No i dont think you can get hypnotized against your will, most of the audience for these 'preachers' are willing hypnotized as they want to believe it. However suibliminal messages are another thing.

So the belief is already there and you are saying that the preachers are using subliminal messages to take their money.
You got proof?
code buttons
QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 13, 11:11 AM) *

QUOTE(project-2501 @ Jul 13, 09:28 AM) *

No i dont think you can get hypnotized against your will, most of the audience for these 'preachers' are willing hypnotized as they want to believe it. However suibliminal messages are another thing.

So the belief is already there and you are saying that the preachers are using subliminal messages to take their money.
You got proof?


http://home.trbc.org/index.cfm?PID=9052
project-2501
QUOTE(code buttons @ Jul 13, 08:27 PM) *

QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 13, 11:11 AM) *

QUOTE(project-2501 @ Jul 13, 09:28 AM) *

No i dont think you can get hypnotized against your will, most of the audience for these 'preachers' are willing hypnotized as they want to believe it. However suibliminal messages are another thing.

So the belief is already there and you are saying that the preachers are using subliminal messages to take their money.
You got proof?


http://home.trbc.org/index.cfm?PID=9052


I'm not sure what that is meant to be , but yes i believe that these preachers provide false senses of hope for vulnerable people who are crying out in their desperation. They misquote passages from the bible explaining rules about the 'tithe' and how giving money means you get money. And so these poor individuals who do not have much anyway are brainwashed into believing their lies and give away large amounts which these so called 'men of god' pocket for themselves.
The proof? Personal experience.
code buttons
QUOTE(project-2501 @ Jul 13, 01:58 PM) *

I'm not sure what that is meant to be , but yes i believe that these preachers provide false senses of hope for vulnerable people who are crying out in their desperation. They misquote passages from the bible explaining rules about the 'tithe' and how giving money means you get money. And so these poor individuals who do not have much anyway are brainwashed into believing their lies and give away large amounts which these so called 'men of god' pocket for themselves.
The proof? Personal experience.

Maybe they deserve it for being such gullable bone-heads! The church lay-out belongs to Jerry Falwell's temple, made with the 'contributions' of such gullable bone-heads!
project-2501
QUOTE(code buttons @ Jul 13, 11:12 PM) *

QUOTE(project-2501 @ Jul 13, 01:58 PM) *

I'm not sure what that is meant to be , but yes i believe that these preachers provide false senses of hope for vulnerable people who are crying out in their desperation. They misquote passages from the bible explaining rules about the 'tithe' and how giving money means you get money. And so these poor individuals who do not have much anyway are brainwashed into believing their lies and give away large amounts which these so called 'men of god' pocket for themselves.
The proof? Personal experience.

Maybe they deserve it for being such gullable bone-heads! The church lay-out belongs to Jerry Falwell's temple, made with the 'contributions' of such gullable bone-heads!


It is brainwashing, from children they have been brought up to believe these things. Its very difficult from such a background to 'think' for your self.
Guest
This idea of it being difficult to think for ones self can be associated with every aspect of education world media and peer influence.

Not to take away from your rant, but not every preacher is out there strictly to take advantage of people and take their money. Many are following their beliefs and applying themselves in earnest effort to spread what they believe is truth.

Do you consider yourself immune to being manipulated?
Do you take sides in politics?
Do you buy gasoline?
maximus242
QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 13, 10:57 AM) *

QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 13, 08:56 AM) *

QUOTE(project-2501 @ Jul 13, 05:14 AM) *

Thanks, I have been studying the techniques used by preachers and I think they used some sort of mass hypnotism to swindle the poor masses into giving them money! Damn televangelists!

Do you believe you can be hypnotized against your will?

Maybe some study in hypnotism is in order.


Yes you can be hypnotized against your will, the basis of it is that you dont know you are being hypnotised theirfore how do you fight something that in your mind does not exist? Milton Erickson sucessfully hypnotised a university student who was VERY well versed in hypnosis and active resistance to it, he not only hypnotised her but convinced her sub-conscious to hid information from her conscious. The whole time she was told she would have an attempted hypnosis on her, she was very keen on proving that Milton couldnt hypnotise her, but he did so quite sucessfully.
Guest
Humanity has been living in a drugged state, under hypnosis, in a slumber, as sleepwalkers, for a long time.
Our consciousness has been trapped in the bottle of the mind. Mind is the problem -- it stands between us and a direct experience of Truth.
Enlightened awareness brings insight into the foolishness of all our beliefs, ideas, words and concepts. Truth is beyond any thought, beyond any expression.
code buttons
QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 13, 03:24 PM) *

...Many are following their beliefs and applying themselves in earnest effort to spread what they believe is truth...

Viral memes

QUOTE(Guest @ Jul 13, 05:43 PM) *

...Truth is beyond any thought, beyond any expression...

But not beyond reach!
Guest
QUOTE
Yes you can be hypnotized against your will, the basis of it is that you dont know you are being hypnotised theirfore how do you fight something that in your mind does not exist?

Doewn't this bring up the question of whether man is rational in his thought and belief of reality if he can so easily be removed from what his mind and senses tell him is real when in fact there is so much that he does not know exists or is aware of outside of his awareness.
How then do you determine whether what is happening is good or bad?
What if being hypnotized strengthens the subtlety of awareness to realize those aspects of reality that are beyond the surface thoughts of belief and sensory perception?

There is a saying "what doesn't kill you makes you stronger."

QUOTE
Many are following their beliefs and applying themselves in earnest effort to spread what they believe is truth...


Viral memes

A possiblity that one doesn't inherently do the best they can even under mitigating circumstances?
Is man therefore infected in other ways as well? How deep is the infection and does it pertain to all thoughts of reality? Spirituality includes politics and science as well as God. Belief is belief and it has its origins in what one is told to believe from the beginning of ones life.
Is there no freedom of will other than that which is programmed into the mind?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.


Home     |     About     |    Research     |    Forum     |    Feedback  


Copyright © BrainMeta. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Last Modified Tue Jan 17 2006 12:39 am