Hi, everyone,
I'm new here. I have some trouble finding information about the difference between induced and evoked activity, in the field of EEG for instance. I mean a good definition. Here's the best I found :
Some authors have made a distinction between evoked and induced rhythms or activity. Consistent with the definitions and historical introduction in the recent volume on "Induced Rhythms in the Brain" (Baar and Bullock 1992), the distinction recommended is the following. Induced rhythms form the broader category; of which evoked rhythms are a subset. The term induced rhythms was introduced to call attention to a large variety of oscillatory responses that follow either clearly timed stimuli or less sharply timed state changes such as attention, sleep, expectations and seizures. Induced rhythms may be tightly or loosely time- and/or phase-locked to the triggering event and hence may appear in averaged responses or only in single trials. Evoked rhythms are the subset following clearly timed stimuli or events; they may also be more or less tightly time-locked and survive averaging well or poorly. The term evoked is generally not used for responses to less sharply timed state changes or events, such as those just named. It is used for responses that are either rhythmic or, more commonly, episodic such as one or more peaks of different duration. Nonrhythmic, episodic peaks or bumps are not generally called induced except as a common word like elicited or caused. The terms evoked and induced thus overlap. It is wise to add adjectives when some feature is important, such as "phase-locked" or "nonphase-locked," "averaged" or "not averaged," rather than to set up still more jargon by arbitrary distinctions not widely understood.
Anyone familiar wih the topic ?
Regards.[QUOTE][I]