The logic of women?

This is great, Bill! I subscribe to the logic in general.

An A plus, so it must be proven true. But shouldn't it be the infinite root, not square root in the fourth step? Then the answer would be one.

I'm quite sure everyone knows that I respect the ladies just as much as the gents on our wee planet!
I take it as read, that since no ladies have criticised me for this post that either no ladies read this board or that ladies realise my sense of humour (and that of most gents) and are quite happy to put it down to our superiority!
I have little doubt that pure mathematicians will probably find fault with the logic therein, but submit that it's just for a laugh - should probably have gone into the humour board (also realising that 'men' could replace 'women' in the equations).

Who's complaining? The science/math board seems good enough. My wife said I was in hot water after I emailed the image link to her, but when I got home I found she was joking, as I had suspected all along.

Moving on from this drop of humour to something a bit more serious, I have just realised that all wemen and women really need is 'enuff'.

I know that maths allows us to count and do all sorts of complicated things to understand life and to build better lives, but if everybody in the world had just enuff of what they needed for their health, shelter, and security I am sure that the world would be a better place to live in.

The problem is that "need" is defined by individuals. Some of these "need" predation of the weak.

Thanks Rick; I agree entirely.
I have edited my post to show the basic needs (as defined by Maslow I think) rather than 'any' need.
I also know that 'enuff' is also different for everyone, so some realistic limits would need to be applied to hoarders.
That impies external control which implies corruption which implies non-possibility of ever achieving enuff for everyone.

What a sad reflection on the human race?
And we call ourselves civilised!!!

I am on the verge of establishing a coherent political philosophy. It might be said that the sole just role of government is to prevent predation of the weak by the strong. That includes the rape of the environment by polluting businesses, of course.

The rapacious predators need to be constrained in many ways, as they have proven over and over again throughout history. Violent criminals are merely the least sophisticated cases. The greedy isolationists are in need of coercion to contribute their fair share.

For example, the owner of 100 trucks profits from them but he also benefits from good roads. In fact, he benefits from good roads about 100 times as much as the owner of one truck. Similiarly for education. The business owner benefits far more from an educated workforce than does a worker from his own public education. Therefore, the greedy rich ought to be fairly taxed in proportion to their benefits.

This is liberalism.

Indeed, there exist rich philanthropists, but they are very rare. By and large, if you see a rich person, he got that way and stays that way, and influences the law to get richer because he is greedy.

Funding good quality public education is a form of protecting the weak from predators.

Richness and poorness are relative in financial terms.

As a point of interest, has anyone seen figures for the total money plus the value of all realised assets in the world and worked out the $ or £ per person?

female reply:

1. If woman takes a man out of her life she receives time, so:

woman - man = time

2. Time is more expensive than money:

time >> money, so

woman - man >> money =>

WOMAN >> MAN + MONEY

Well done Katy!
I think it would have been enough for you to equate time to money.

The time is uncompareble to money!!!

interesting math. From woman-man=money (Katy's #1), I derive woman-man=problems, which also implies that problems-man=problems, or alternatively, man=0.

Another women's reply
1. To find a women you need time and money therefore:
Women= time * money

2. 'Time is money' so : Women = money * money = money square
3. Money is the square root of all problems , so
money square = problem

Finally: women =problems

You may have believed this equation, but in my opinion the right solution should be :

From step 2 : 'Time is money' so Women = time * time = time square

3. Time is invaluable , so women = indefinite value
Well, if you don't believe my result, you can try spending time on women, maybe you can find something valuable However, it's not a promise 0=)

Click to view attachment

Haha

HeyHey I have never seen that before.

I'll bet they accuse you of male chauvenism, with some justification, I might add.

I just found it lying in the road after a pink truck had driven by. It's nothing to do with me ......

Don, you are at serious risk of injuring your academic career by playing these little games. Give respect to get respect.

That was funny!
I'd love to see more equations where it tries to fit in with real reality.

Haha, I was literatly laughing out loud when I read Bills and Hey Hey's posts. Woman = Problems lol, that was awsome. Hey Hey, I was working out too hard a couple days ago so my sides are sore, I was in pain when I read your post because I couldnt stop laughing.

Thanks for the awsome posts guys

Really awesome post made even me to laugh.I would like to wish all the Guys a lol.
Great job.


Cheers