Joesus' Cult Options

[Dan]

Carl (also known as 'joesus')

since I can't be heard on your own board ( http://pub141.ezboard.com/ftheishayatraditionfrm1 , here Carl is known as 'maha') without being seen as 'abusive', I thought I'd bring it over here.

Your 'philosophy' is junk, all you do is convince people to ditch their life and follow you into your own narcissistic delusions. The fact of the matter is that you are a sociopath, manipulating people without conscience.

http://home.datawest.net/esn-recovery/artcls/socio.htm
http://www.rickross.com/reference/brainwas...nwashing11.html

your little cult is laughably transparent to anybody who is not fooled by your 'charm' and your philosophy of intentional ignorance. I pity all the fools who believe in you and follow you, because in the end they will have to come to terms with the dismal condition they have fallen into.

keep erasing everything I post over on your board, because your control over your subjects depends on it
================================

Dan, this is not intended as an edit, here is why: How do I (Lindsay) reach an administrator? I can post here, but I cannot reply to it. I get a notification of an error. Could the problem be with my 'puter?
Also, I cannot post a picture, an avatar or a signature.

[Shawn]

[quote author=Joesus link=board=7;threadid=3183;start=#msg15526 date=1068007047]
My Job is not to convince anyone of anything but to lead each to their own self discovery.
[/quote]

isn't furthering your own self-discovery part of your Job?

[quote author=Joesus link=board=7;threadid=3183;start=#msg15526 date=1068007047]
I have neither the time or the inclination to save the world
[/quote]

what is the world to you after all, or rather, what do you make it? Does not having the inclination to save the world free you from the responsibility to save the world?

[quote author=Joesus link=board=7;threadid=3183;start=#msg15526 date=1068007047]
When one finds union with all things they always act in accord with the will of the whole.
[/quote]

do you believe there's just one 'will of the whole'? If there's just one will of the whole, then why is it so, umm, messy and, on the surface, randomly directed in large part? Is the messiness not part of the 'will of the whole'? What I mean by 'messy' can be illustrated in the following: I will to move my arm to reach for a cup and it travels in almost a straight line; it's not like I move my arm around in some awkward motion or in circles to reach the cup, which I would characterize as a 'messy' arm movement. So, if there is just one 'will of the whole', then why does it seem so 'messy'?