Why the science is silent about the unimaginable, Only the existence of God is acceptable and explicable Options

[antonyanil]

Why the science is silent about the unimaginable
Only the existence of God is acceptable and explicable

The silence of science about the unimaginable God is mis-understood as the negation. Similarly, the silence of Buddha about the unimaginable God was mistaken as negation of God. By this, both Buddha and science were treated as the sources of atheism. Silence does not mean negation of unimaginable entity. Even the authority of theism, the Veda, says that the best expression of God is silence. Even Shankara clearly stated that the absolute God (Parabrahman) is always expressed by silence. Shankara debated with the followers of Buddha only on this point and proved that silence is not the indication of negation of God. Silence is only the acceptance of existence of unimaginable God.

You must say that the unimaginable God exists. You are authorized only up to this single point. The Veda says that only the existence of God is acceptable and explicable (Astityeva…). Regarding the further information of God, silence is to be adopted. The acceptance of existence of unimaginable God is based on the exhibition of unimaginable events called as miracles. The multiplicity in the unimaginable events is not the multiplicity in the unimaginable item. There is only one unimaginable item called as God. He is establishing the existence of the unimaginable item on several occasions using several imaginable materials. Therefore, the multiplicity is only in the occasions and in the imaginable materials and it is not in the final conclusion, which is the existence of single unimaginable item. Already, we have established that there cannot be multiplicity in the unimaginable item.
www.universal-spirituality.org
Universal Spirituality for World Peace

[Jakare]

I really hope human kind stops relying on gods to solve our problems. 2000 years of preys to christ didn´t make people healthier, however 200 years of science development have made miracles on that. Even if Science doesn´t negate god, till this very moment Science has told us god is not needed, and by saying that puts in evidence any religion that wants its belivers to follow certain rules or tradition, sometimes against common sense. We can´t expect religions and some religious people to not to feel under attack.

Although I understand that some Philosophies or religions can turn "some" wild or lost people into peaceful loving beings I think the problem is they believe on the utopy of being capable of turning the whole human kind into that, sometimes using physical or psychological coercion (or at least they expect to "kindly" get rid of the not so convinced). Because that is not posible religions and philosophies keep failing, sometimes even doing more harm than good.

[PANCHO]

I think religions have good and bad things. They make people feel better but at the same time they lock them up and make them think the gods will save them. So instead of helping themselves, they rely on God to solve their problems, which can end up not solving anything. It locks their understanding of things.

It is funny because the same thing also happens with science. People believe that science one day will solve their spiritual problems (and all the problems of humanity). People rely on science for many things and they even now start to view their bodies\lives as a scientific material object. So in a way, science has also good and bad things.

Putting your hopes in one single basket may not be a good life investment.