BrainMeta'                 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Introversion vs Extraversion
astroidea
post Oct 23, 2010, 03:44 PM
Post #1


Aspiring
**

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 97
Joined: May 22, 2008
Member No.: 22853



My own theory on the subject is that introverts have certain social expectations that they feel that they must fulfill, hence it's very energy draining for them to socialize. It makes them need to try to be able to socialize. They try to find the right words to say rather than just speaking their mind, and that gets very fatiguing. Extraverts, on the other hand, feel comfortable with being themselves, hence they are often known to speak before they think, as opposed to introverts who think before they speak. Also, if you think about it, all of us have had times where when we socialize where we feel energized, and we've all of us have had times where when we socialize, we feel drained. If you think about when we feel energized, isn't it when we share something that energizes us, something that gets us excited, something we feel passionate about. So what really is it that makes someone an introvert or extravert if everyone has moments of introversion and extraversion? While when Carl Jung originally popularized the concepts of introversion and extraversion, he made the traits seem like a type, you're either one type or the other, while in personality research today, it's much more popular to regard it in a continuum.

There are also many interesting studies on the link between extraversion and dopamine, particularly in the brain's reward systems. It is found that extraverts have higher levels of dopamine in these reward centers. This has two main effects, first is a higher positive affect, or in other words, they are happier, and secondly, higher dopamine levels also mean that that are much less inhibited in acting out impulses. It is found that in order to execute a behavior, a certain dopamine level must be reached for this to occur. In this sense, I feel that introversion is almost a form of pathology. It is very rare to almost non existent for one that is extraverted to be depressed, but depression is highly correlated with introversion. But at the same time, I feel that there are many benefits to introversion. The facts are, it's nearly impossible for anyone to be perfect content with the way they are at all given moments of their lives. A leading psychiatrist says that depression is not a human defect at all, but a defense mechanism that in its mild and moderate forms can force a healthy reassessment of personal circumstances.

Given this, I feel that introversion and extraversion are less of personality traits, but more as personality states of a person. If you think of intuition vs sensing, thinking vs feeling, judging vs perception, these are more of lifelong traits, whereas I see a person moving across the introversion and extraversion continuum throughout her lifetime.

References:
http://personality-p...wr.ext.rev2.pdf
http://scan.oxfordjo...nsq078.abstract
http://news.bbc.co.u...ine/7268496.stm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Vertigo
post Dec 09, 2010, 08:55 AM
Post #2


Newbie
*

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Aug 24, 2010
Member No.: 33029



a fair enough assessment, imho. I agree that introversion and extroversion are personality states and not traits but it would still be a personality trait to have psychological tendencies pertaining to what states one is in under various circumstances. I like that this angle gives it more depth than a simple continuum though, as the continuum explanation often makes it sound like something you can simply quantify by placing a mark on a scale and saying "that's me" and acting like that's a complete explanation. This reminds me of a popular metaphor I built upon to describe something that isn't so simple; I never thought the "it's not black and white" term to do some subjects justice so I frequently go on to say something along the lines of "and it's not just a scale of grays either, it's more like a rainbow" - because when people say something isn't black and white they just mean it's not this or that, it's something in between - but that still requires the simplified view that all that it (whatever it is) can be can be summed up as being somewhere between this on a straight line from one extreme to the other which more often than not isn't the case when people use the "not black and white" analogy/metaphor. Wait, why am I explaining a rainbow metaphor again? Oh yeah, I agree with you about introversion/extroversion and even though you did specifically describe it as a continuum rather than a question with only two possible answers, which certainly sounds closer to the mark, the rest of your post came across as taking it one big step further than a continuum and bringing color to it rather leaving it as just white, black and every shade of gray in between.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 12:21 AM


Home     |     About     |    Research     |    Forum     |    Feedback  


Copyright © BrainMeta. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Last Modified Tue Jan 17 2006 12:39 am

Consciousness Expansion · Brain Mapping · Neural Circuits · Connectomics  ·  Neuroscience Forum  ·  Brain Maps Blog