| PJS |
Oct 07, 2010, 09:52 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Awakening ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 216 Joined: Aug 17, 2006 Member No.: 5507 |
x^3 + 2x^2 = 1
2x^2 = 1 - x^3 x^2 = (1 - x^3)/2 x = sqrt (1 - x^3)/2 1/x = averaged phi For example: x = 0.6 x = sqrt (1 - 0.216)/2 x = sqrt (0.784 / 2) = 0.392 x = sqrt 0.392 = 0.62609903369994111499456862724476 1/x = 1.5971914124998497831494097633795 next enter x = 0.62609903369994111499456862724476 Continue to enter each subsequent x into sqrt (1 - x^3)/2 then invert the answer 1/x for averaged phi. After a few entries the number phi will start to be produced. P.j.S |
![]() ![]() |
| Flex |
May 12, 2012, 08:52 AM
Post
#2
|
|
God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 1894 Joined: Oct 17, 2006 From: Bay area CA Member No.: 5877 |
Sum (n=0 to infinity) tr^n =t+tr+tr^2...tr^n
Ok so this is the series expansion whose sum converges to t/1-r Let now look at the solution we get to this series expansion when we look at the sum where n=i and the function itself is e^-ui/KbT and ui=ixKbT Reduces to sum n=i of e^-i and when t=1 and r=1/e we get the ratio of e/(e-1) = 1.5819..... Pretty damn close to phi eh? Now if we take this and square it, we get (e/e-1)^2 = 3.16395 Notice that the first number is less than phi, but close, and the squared term is more than pi, but close. If we carry this on forever, I believe we get close and closer to true values of both numbers. The reason we never get a real solution is that the answer is relating two irrational numbers, resulting in an irrational solution. Looks like a fractal to me *I apologize for the chemistry variables I used, I came the this conclusion in class the other day lol. Basically the idea is that if you take something like (1/e^0)+(1/e^1)+(1/e^n) you near phi, and when we square phi, we near pi. I do not think it any coincidence the random ass solution I came up with in class happens to be very similar to the time constant. In fact, to me it almost seems like two sides of the same coin. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_constant |
| P JayS |
May 14, 2012, 03:07 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Demi-God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 585 Joined: Apr 04, 2012 Member No.: 34146 |
Sum (n=0 to infinity) tr^n =t+tr+tr^2...tr^n Ok so this is the series expansion whose sum converges to t/1-r Let now look at the solution we get to this series expansion when we look at the sum where n=i and the function itself is e^-ui/KbT and ui=ixKbT Reduces to sum n=i of e^-i and when t=1 and r=1/e we get the ratio of e/(e-1) = 1.5819..... Pretty damn close to phi eh? Now if we take this and square it, we get (e/e-1)^2 = 3.16395 Notice that the first number is less than phi, but close, and the squared term is more than pi, but close. If we carry this on forever, I believe we get close and closer to true values of both numbers. The reason we never get a real solution is that the answer is relating two irrational numbers, resulting in an irrational solution. Looks like a fractal to me *I apologize for the chemistry variables I used, I came the this conclusion in class the other day lol. Basically the idea is that if you take something like (1/e^0)+(1/e^1)+(1/e^n) you near phi, and when we square phi, we near pi. I do not think it any coincidence the random ass solution I came up with in class happens to be very similar to the time constant. In fact, to me it almost seems like two sides of the same coin. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_constant When you square phi you get 1 + phi. But when you multiply phi by 2 you get a figure near pi. 2(phi) - 1 - sqrt 5 = 0 2(phi) = 1 + sqrt 5 How does multiplying your answer by 2 instead of squaring affect your answer 2(e/e-1) approximately pi? |
PJS Averaging Phi Oct 07, 2010, 09:52 AM
Jupiter This is a non intelligent way to compute Phi ,the ... Jul 23, 2011, 10:21 AM
P.j.S
This is a non intelligent way to compute Phi ,the... Jul 26, 2011, 04:00 AM
PJS New Discovery about Phi.
(sqrt 5 + 1) / 2 = phi
... Oct 25, 2011, 05:20 PM
PJS
New Discovery about Phi.
(sqrt 5 + 1) / 2 = phi
... Jan 03, 2012, 06:09 AM
PJS
New Discovery about Phi.
(sqrt 5 + 1) / 2 = phi
... Jan 03, 2012, 06:11 AM
P. Jay
New Discovery about Phi.
(sqrt 5 + 1) / 2 = phi... Jan 03, 2012, 04:42 PM
Phi so they say... Oct 27, 2011, 11:03 PM
PJS i thought that i found a new whole number but a ca... Nov 07, 2011, 11:11 AM
PJS x = 1/phi
x = (-1 + sqrt 5) / 2 = 1/x = 1/phi
1/... Jan 03, 2012, 04:11 AM
P JayS operators: * / + - o
phi oppose 1/phi
phi o 1/phi... Apr 19, 2012, 02:46 PM
P JayS
operators: * / + - o
phi oppose 1/phi
phi o 1/ph... Apr 21, 2012, 06:27 AM
P JayS 2x^2 + 3y + z = 1
z = 1 - (2x^2 + 3y)
2x^2 + 3y =... May 12, 2012, 07:02 AM
P JayS x = 0.5
2x^2 + 3y + z = 1
.5 + 0.125 + z = 1
0.62... May 12, 2012, 07:57 AM
Flex
x = 0.5
2x^2 + 3y + z = 1
.5 + 0.125 + z = 1
0.6... May 12, 2012, 08:12 AM
P JayS
x = 0.5
2x^2 + 3y + z = 1
.5 + 0.125 + z = 1
0.... May 12, 2012, 08:23 AM
P JayS 1 + 1 + z = 1
(x^3 + 2x^2) + (3y + 2x^2) + z = 1
... May 12, 2012, 08:36 AM
P JayS
Sum (n=0 to infinity) tr^n =t+tr+tr^2...tr^n
... May 12, 2012, 08:55 AM
Flex
[quote name='Flex' post='119276' date='May 12, 20... May 15, 2012, 03:14 AM
Flex Beautiful man... Those A-holes who made fun of you... May 12, 2012, 01:17 PM
P JayS a. x^3 + 2x^2 - 3y - 2x^2 = 0
x^3 - 3y = 0
-3y = ... May 15, 2012, 10:36 AM
balika This is a good idea to all the people in the world... Nov 15, 2012, 10:23 AM
P JayS
x^3 + 2x^2 = 1
2x^2 = 1 - x^3
x^2 = (1 - x^3)/2
... Jan 08, 2013, 02:05 PM
P JayS x = ?
x = 1
1 = ?
0 = ? - x
0 = ? - 1
? = 1
x = ... Jan 19, 2013, 03:31 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 12:23 AM |