BrainMeta'                 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Bi-Polar yes but not really an Ego Maniac
P.j.S
post Jun 17, 2009, 05:46 AM
Post #1


Overlord
****

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 358
Joined: Jun 12, 2009
Member No.: 32189



Hi. I started my internet appearance with an Alias Pi-Guy and an interest in math on early MSN Communities about 8 or 9 years ago.

Wanting to share an unpopular rational pi effort with others to see if it had any merit at all. These communities and later MSN Groups contained people who attacked me personally by duplicating my Alias and posting a pornograghic picture to it. Once the thread was opened the surprise picture was there and it automatically filled page after page of the site. It was difficult to stop and my Alias was ruined. I was forced to use my real name to protect the Ownership of my work particularly (All Rights Reserved!) to continue on. I had received so much help learning about irrational pi from decent people that this truly was dissappointing.

Later others after learning that I did not have the benefit of a higher education made sarcasm in very rude ways of my initials PJS. My original postings which became numerous were proliferated with my name and copywrite reminders much to the further chagrin of the other protagonists.

I would like to advance my original ideas here and strive to encourage others with more apparent visual modesty than I may seem to at present than a "who does this guy think he is?" appearance of some sort. And benefit from my initials P.j.S that stand for the School of P.j.S Original Mathematics & Related Sciences that I started on my MSN Group Creative Pi which has actually become quite unique intact with its own Legalities Department.

Now when my initials P.j.S are posted it will represent my School and my continued stance of All Rights Reserved! on past and current postings since my stance has endured much effort being spawn from many years of hard work on MSN. It is still relatively unknown what MSN will finally do with everyones personally prized information on their individual Groups.

Now instead of something presented like this all the time as the occasion arose in the past:

Creative Pi: (x y^7 z^2) / (x y^7(k/3)) = 3P Abstract Algebraic Equation and the Creative Pi Geometric Spencer Construction Owned by Peter Jeffrey Spencer with All Rights Reserved!

and other stuff like:

E=mc^2 Revised by PJS and The Theory of Space 0/0 Dynamics by PJS where I define 0/0=1 and work with a^n - b^n - c^n = 0 in the process and formulate The Relitivity of Time.

All Rights Reserved!
Peter Jeffrey Spencer

Also i problems derived from an equation x^3 - 2x^2 = 1 that I discovered while experimenting with averaging phi. Here x, x^2 and x^3 all = -1 at the same time.

x = -1
-2x^2 = -x^3 + 1
x^2 = (-x^3 + 1) /-2
x^2 = (-x^3/-2) + (1/-2)
x^2 = (x^3/2) + (1/-2)
x^2 = (x/2) + (1/-2)
x^2 = (-1/2) + (1/-2)
x^2 = -1, same value as x and x^3
sqrt x^2 = sqrt -1
x = sqrt -1 = -1
x = x^2 = -1

x^3 - 2x^2 = 1
x^3 - 2(-1) = 1
x^3 + 2 = 1
x^3 = 1 - 2
x^3 = -1
x = -1
x^2 + 1 = 0, x^2 = -1
Now all three equal -1 at the same time: x, x^2 and x^3. Therefore:
x^2 = -1 then x = sqrt -1. x = -1 also so now sqrt -1 = -1 by means of x.

Or like for example this, values in productivity between marriage and business:
simplifying -1=24-25 to 2.4*2.5=6
-1 = 24 - 25
-1/10 = 24/10 - 25/10
-0.1 = 2.4 - 2.5
(-60 * -0.1) = (-60*2.4) - (-60*2.5)
(-60 - -60) + (2.4*2.5) = 6
Thus -1=24-25 simplified to 2.4*2.5=6
6 - 1 = 5 The Child of Productivity!

eg. Two distinct ways of finding right triangles
1) Pythagorus Theorem: a^2 + b^2 = c^2 free to use
2) The Spencer Triangle Method:c = x + y, c^2 = cx + cy free to use until you plan to charge for having used it somehow.

Side c = x + y
eg. c = 24 then x = 15 and y = 9 so 24 = 15 + 9 = side c

then c^2 = cx + cy
sqrt cx = side a
sqrt cy = side b
so using our example
side a = sqrt (24*15) = 18.97366596
side b = sqrt (24*9) = 14.69693846
side c = 24

Double checking with Pythagoras Theorem c^2 = a^2 + b^2
proves that the Spencer Triangle Method: c = x + y using only one side being that of the hypotenuse has formed a right triangle.

Again mentioning this piece of math from a little bit of calculus a^n - b^n => 0. To what I have formulated with it like a^n - b^n - c^n = 0 for working with E=mc^2 in space and time. To do so I had to define that 0/0=1 as well and Revise E=mc^2 a little bit by making c^2 miles/second instead of second^2. The visible rings around Saturn lend great support to my Theory of Space 0/0 Dynamics.

Also including recent work in Prime Numbers again. Learn how to count from 0 to 110 first for yourself perhaps.

My Expressions all can now be simply summed up (including ones not seen here) as follows:

Creative Pi TM and the Theory of Space 0/0 Dynamics. In P.j.S Mathematica part of the School,

P.j.S Original Mathematics & Related Sciences or just as "P.j.S" as it is already known.

P.j.S
All Rights Reserved!
Peter Jeffrey Spencer,

PJS
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Hey Hey
post Jun 25, 2009, 01:12 PM
Post #2


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 7763
Joined: Dec 31, 2003
Member No.: 845



Is your first language English?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
P.j.S
post Oct 23, 2009, 07:28 AM
Post #3


Overlord
****

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 358
Joined: Jun 12, 2009
Member No.: 32189



QUOTE(Hey Hey @ Jun 25, 2009, 01:12 PM) *

Is your first language English?

Yes.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
P.j.S
post Nov 28, 2009, 01:23 PM
Post #4


Overlord
****

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 358
Joined: Jun 12, 2009
Member No.: 32189



The School of P.j.S Original Mathematics & Related Sciences

Creative Pi: A rational pi solution (x y^7 z^2) / (x y^7(k/3)) = 3P with x=4, y=7 and z=360/7^3. Only the ten factorial (10!) circumference is known at the start. C/d=pi

Creative Pi Geometric Spencer Construction: diagram proving 1080/7^3 as pi.

The Spencer Triangle Method:c = x + y, solves for right triangles using only one side of the triangle. c^2 = cx + cy

i Problems: x^3 - 2x^2 = 1, disproves x^2 + 1 = 0 and i^2 + 1 = 0 as being equal to God. But allows chaos (-1 = +1) to be
i^2 + 1 = :0: which is in order with (-1 = -1) and (+1 = +1) or the counting infinities on a number line with 0 in the middle in a :-1: dimension within the lesser than zero space of the zero ":0:" dimension.

The Principle of Productivity: -1 = 24 - 25 simplified to (-60 - -60) + (2.4 * 2.5) = 6, two single states combine into one productive married state. This precedes the financial institution -60(2.4 - 2.5) = 6.

E=mc^2 Revised by PJS: an - bn - cn = 0 and The Relativity of Time.
A pure invisible energy source slows down with energized time to penetrate the void with dark energy to create slower moving invisible points of dark matter within the void as friction causes the points to slow further to become visible matter.

Darklight: energy spanning the distance of c^7 miles or 7.77x10^36 miles universal diameter in one second with the mathematical speed of light as 186234.5035... miles per second. Basic darklight c^2 miles per second making up individual strands of space fabric in 360 degrees in all directions from the origin of the spherical universe. c^2 speed space fabric are in an instantaneous binary existence with the void in time. Both space fabric and the void are present at the same time.

The Theory of Space 0/0 Dynamics: defining the clarity of 0/0=1 among the dimensions with Creative Pi a perfect circle in time with a radius 0.5 second long in a spherical universe with the energy of darklight maintaining space buoyancy in the void.

...also other miscellaneous things of mine found on BrainMeta.com Forum or archived on MSN Groups.

Like work with learning how to count from 0 to at least 110 with the use of Prime Numbers.

Original Work listed above owned by Peter Jeffrey Spencer. All Rights Reserved!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PJS
post Mar 26, 2011, 08:47 PM
Post #5


Awakening
***

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Aug 17, 2006
Member No.: 5507



I have a modest site on Multiply.com where there is a guest book that can be signed without a membership if I am not mistaken.

http://school0pjs1.multiply.com/
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jakare
post Mar 26, 2011, 09:50 PM
Post #6


Demi-God
*****

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 589
Joined: Feb 24, 2010
Member No.: 32635



What is your relationship with watchtower?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Guest_Peter Jeffrey Spencer_*
post Mar 26, 2011, 10:15 PM
Post #7


Unregistered









QUOTE(Jakare @ Mar 26, 2011, 09:50 PM) *

What is your relationship with watchtower?

I am one of Jehovah's Witnesses.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Flex
post Mar 27, 2011, 10:01 AM
Post #8


God
******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 1954
Joined: Oct 17, 2006
From: Bay area CA
Member No.: 5877



Well to start, the sqrt of -1 is i unless I am horribly mistaken? I is defined as i^2=-1. Therefore your proof is false. x^2 = 1 and therefore does not equal -1... You could say that i^2=-1 but that does not mean that i=-1 since sqrt of i^2 is obviously i.

*It is important to note that I suck at math relative to someone who has made it a career. My knowledge is limited to multivariable calculous, linear algebra and differential equations.

I totally agree with you that higher education is of no real importance, but you may find it of benefit to go shadow a few classes. There is nothing that says you have to pay for higher education (well I guess technically you do, but no one has to know lol). You would probably really enjoy getting involved in an IPAM (institute of pure and applied mathematics) and learn a ton of cool stuff.

Most importantly is to understand that math is a byproduct of human reason, and you need to clearly define your goals and expectations in approaching mathematical problems. What exactly are you attempting to prove? Who cares if x, x^2, and x^3 =-1 (which they don't) at the same time? Where does this get you? If I define X as 1, X, X^2, and X^3 all equal 1 at the same time, but who cares?

You have to have a purpose for a proof. Newton had a reason to eliminate an X in the denominator to use the rhetoric of math to circumvent logic (Zeno's Paradox) to devise a means of solving instantaneous change. The fact of the matter is Newton didn't solve anything. The derivative is no instantaneous change. It works for some simple functions like y=mx+b, where the derivative is equal to m which is constant. Typically when you take a derivative you get a function, there is still no instantaneous change, it is relative to the function as a whole. You can only know the change if you know how the function (system) operates around your point.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PJS
post Mar 27, 2011, 10:24 AM
Post #9


Unregistered









QUOTE(Flex @ Mar 27, 2011, 10:01 AM) *

Well to start, the sqrt of -1 is i unless I am horribly mistaken? I is defined as i^2=-1. Therefore your proof is false. x^2 = 1 and therefore does not equal -1... You could say that i^2=-1 but that does not mean that i=-1 since sqrt of i^2 is obviously i.

*It is important to note that I suck at math relative to someone who has made it a career. My knowledge is limited to multivariable calculous, linear algebra and differential equations.

I totally agree with you that higher education is of no real importance, but you may find it of benefit to go shadow a few classes. There is nothing that says you have to pay for higher education (well I guess technically you do, but no one has to know lol). You would probably really enjoy getting involved in an IPAM (institute of pure and applied mathematics) and learn a ton of cool stuff.

Most importantly is to understand that math is a byproduct of human reason, and to clearly define your goals and expectations in approaching mathematical problems. What exactly are you attempting to prove?

"i" is just a label for x^2 + 1 = 0. In the equation x^3 - 2x^2 = 1 x^1 equals both 1 and -1.

I just wanted to share the math that I discovered. Originally I sought an income somehow but now my stance is that if you profit from my math then I want to as well. I will charge you for a share.

I would like to prove that the universe sprang from order not just chaos for one thing

Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PJS
post Mar 27, 2011, 10:27 AM
Post #10


Awakening
***

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Aug 17, 2006
Member No.: 5507



QUOTE(PJS @ Mar 27, 2011, 10:24 AM) *

QUOTE(Flex @ Mar 27, 2011, 10:01 AM) *

Well to start, the sqrt of -1 is i unless I am horribly mistaken? I is defined as i^2=-1. Therefore your proof is false. x^2 = 1 and therefore does not equal -1... You could say that i^2=-1 but that does not mean that i=-1 since sqrt of i^2 is obviously i.

*It is important to note that I suck at math relative to someone who has made it a career. My knowledge is limited to multivariable calculous, linear algebra and differential equations.

I totally agree with you that higher education is of no real importance, but you may find it of benefit to go shadow a few classes. There is nothing that says you have to pay for higher education (well I guess technically you do, but no one has to know lol). You would probably really enjoy getting involved in an IPAM (institute of pure and applied mathematics) and learn a ton of cool stuff.

Most importantly is to understand that math is a byproduct of human reason, and to clearly define your goals and expectations in approaching mathematical problems. What exactly are you attempting to prove?

"i" is just a label for x^2 + 1 = 0. In the equation x^3 - 2x^2 = 1 x^1 equals both 1 and -1.

I just wanted to share the math that I discovered. Originally I sought an income somehow but now my stance is that if you profit from my math then I want to as well. I will charge you for a share.

I would like to prove that the universe sprang from order not just chaos for one thing

"i^2" is just a label for x^2 + 1 = 0. In the equation x^3 - 2x^2 = 1 x^2 equals both 1 and -1.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Flex
post Mar 27, 2011, 10:37 AM
Post #11


God
******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 1954
Joined: Oct 17, 2006
From: Bay area CA
Member No.: 5877



x^2+1=0

x^2=-1 the definition of i.

sqrt of x^2 when x=-1 is still i not -1...

This is a byproduct of the human creation of math. Stupid shit like i had to be introduced because the rules of math created rhetoric. Based on our rules, there could be no sqrt of a negative number, thus the intuitive definition was created. x^2 will never equal a negative number period. That is what happens when a negative times a negative equals a positive.

i is like mathematical political correctness. Everyone knows it is stupid when they learn it in 7th grade, but you have to deal with it anyways.

Now that that is out of the way... Welcome to the forum! smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PJS
post Mar 27, 2011, 10:47 AM
Post #12


Awakening
***

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Aug 17, 2006
Member No.: 5507



QUOTE(Flex @ Mar 27, 2011, 10:37 AM) *

x^2+1=0

x^2=-1 the definition of i.

sqrt of x^2 when x=-1 is still i not -1...

This is a byproduct of the human creation of math. Stupid shit like i had to be introduced because the rules of math created rhetoric. Based on our rules, there could be no sqrt of a negative number, thus the intuitive definition was created. x^2 will never equal a negative number period. That is what happens when a negative times a negative equals a positive. You can use mathematical rhetoric all you like but it shows nothing, especially the emergence of the Universe.

i is like mathematical political correctness. Everyone knows it is stupid when they learn it in 7th grade, but you have to deal with it anyways.


x^2 + 1 = 0
(-1)^2 + 1 = 2
(-1)^2 + 1 = -2(-1)
x^2 + 1 = -2x
x^2 + 2x + 1 = 0 Now we have the true equation. Taking the square root...
x + 1 = sqrt 0
x + 1 = 0
x = -1

x = -1 and x^2 = -1

x is the sqrt of x^2
x = i

The sqrt of i^2 = x = -1 = i

I have proven i = sqrt -1 to be a mathematical lie.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PJS
post Mar 27, 2011, 11:00 AM
Post #13


Awakening
***

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Aug 17, 2006
Member No.: 5507



QUOTE(PJS @ Mar 27, 2011, 10:47 AM) *

QUOTE(Flex @ Mar 27, 2011, 10:37 AM) *

x^2+1=0

x^2=-1 the definition of i.

sqrt of x^2 when x=-1 is still i not -1...

This is a byproduct of the human creation of math. Stupid shit like i had to be introduced because the rules of math created rhetoric. Based on our rules, there could be no sqrt of a negative number, thus the intuitive definition was created. x^2 will never equal a negative number period. That is what happens when a negative times a negative equals a positive. You can use mathematical rhetoric all you like but it shows nothing, especially the emergence of the Universe.

i is like mathematical political correctness. Everyone knows it is stupid when they learn it in 7th grade, but you have to deal with it anyways.


x^2 + 1 = 0
(-1)^2 + 1 = 2
(-1)^2 + 1 = -2(-1)
x^2 + 1 = -2x
x^2 + 2x + 1 = 0 Now we have the true equation. Taking the square root...
x + 1 = sqrt 0
x + 1 = 0
x = -1

x = -1 and x^2 = -1

x is the sqrt of x^2
x = i

The sqrt of i^2 = x = -1 = i

I have proven i = sqrt -1 to be a mathematical lie.

Either that or I have proved that the i = sqrt -1 equals -1.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jakare
post Mar 27, 2011, 11:11 AM
Post #14


Demi-God
*****

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 589
Joined: Feb 24, 2010
Member No.: 32635



In short PSJ wants to develop a math theory which prove god does exist. Unfortunately as my math skill are near to zero even if he does succeed im not going to be able to understand it.
Is there any reason for you to not to use any of your previous usernames psj?
And sorry but i must bring to your attention`you are on serious danger of proving this:

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Flex
post Mar 27, 2011, 11:12 AM
Post #15


God
******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 1954
Joined: Oct 17, 2006
From: Bay area CA
Member No.: 5877



Now see how much better of a proof that is than x=sqrt -1 = -1 smile.gif

Another cool way to do the proof is purely graphically, replacing the y axis with a second x axis, but I will let you figure that one out!

Next step is the proof of the flying spaghetti monster, which is far more challenging lol.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jakare
post Mar 29, 2011, 03:55 PM
Post #16


Demi-God
*****

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 589
Joined: Feb 24, 2010
Member No.: 32635



And lets just recall how things "should" work in science and how they shoudnt:


Im not sure but it looks like you already got an idea and just wanted to find proof for it.
Last time i had a conversation with Joesus we both got to the idea that trying to prove or reasoning about god existence was headed to fail. Of course we get to that for different reasons.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Guest
post Mar 29, 2011, 11:47 PM
Post #17


Unregistered









Why not draw the conclusion that there is a God from the facts? Many people do.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Flex
post Mar 30, 2011, 05:48 AM
Post #18


God
******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 1954
Joined: Oct 17, 2006
From: Bay area CA
Member No.: 5877



Depends how you define God. If by facts you mean the Bible, there is certainly no scientific validation?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joesus
post Mar 30, 2011, 07:18 AM
Post #19


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 3895
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
From: nowhere and everywhere
Member No.: 601



QUOTE(Guest @ Mar 30, 2011, 07:47 AM) *

Why not draw the conclusion that there is a God from the facts? Many people do.


It is quite possible to know anything at all. If our philosophy of life or our belief system is consistently running into a brick wall where there is no recourse but to leave a vast amount of experience unexplained or explained only by invoking God’s will or impersonal fate -- then we would be wise to ask ourselves if perhaps our system of thought is substituting belief for direct understanding. If we are told to “accept on faith” because “certain things are not open to human understanding” -- watch out! We can spend our entire lifetime in that intellectual cul-de-sac, and when it is over, we will be right back where we were in the beginning -- trying to understand why the Universe is as it is.




QUOTE(Jakare @ Mar 29, 2011, 11:55 PM) *

Last time i had a conversation with Joesus we both got to the idea that trying to prove or reasoning about god existence was headed to fail. Of course we get to that for different reasons.

To refine this statement I would say, "To prove something to another, or to reason with another, is qualified by what the other is willing to see, hear, experience and accept". So any investment in an outcome could come to an experience of failure.
God can be experienced but, to measure it against relative boundaries is pointless for God cannot be defined or contained. Instead it can be described or pointed to from a single or many different experiences. Since experiences change with each approach to the infinite it is reasonable to say that each changing experience of God is valid, but still only a reflection..., experienced in a particular moment of cognitive sensory input. Consciousness has many different subjective and objective points of measure or recognition in its different levels, such as those which are described in waking sleeping and dreaming. Beyond these three are 4 more states of consciousness, which are described in the spiritual sciences of Yoga.
At each subjective and objective level of consciousness are natural laws/conditions, which support expansion of sensory perception. There are things the minds eye can see and yet are invisible to the physical eyes. As such, there are things the physical ears do not hear which are only available to the subtle inner senses. Like the abilities of the human body, certain aspects of co-ordination can come into play at different ages if developed and nurtured, and some wane and become difficult due to a lack of support and practice.
Mostly those who have conditioned themselves to taking the senses outward have no ability to understand those who have disciplined their awareness to draw from the subtle senses that are the examples of expanded consciousness.
Generally speaking such people like Melchizedek, Jesus, Buddha, Confucius or Zoroaster who had spent some time describing their experiences of God and their mastery of consciousness over the relative, were seen as oddities in and amongst the "Normal" condition of humanity that was plagued by ignorance, superstition and a general lack of comprehension. Which was/is due to the steadfast conditioning of belief in the suffering and victimization to random events in a world of chaos that was accepted as the normal human condition.

Scientists today are just beginning to theorize and accept what they(The masters of consciousness) taught lifetimes ago, that the body and the world around us are extensions of consciousness itself, which is not bound or dependent on the physical body. As such the mind, used as a lens, by consciousness absolute, has profound effects on the relative physical world around us.
This consciousness labeled as God amongst other things, is tangible, and approachable, but it cannot be contained or measured by the relative instruments of relative design. It can only be experienced with the human instrument of the minds awareness and its subtle senses. Since so many people are locked into a single way of thinking due to the conditioning of beliefs in what the authority says is true (relatively speaking), humanity often ignores anything that will not fit into the relative box.
It was only 500 years ago that someone challenged the socially accepted reality that the world was flat. It will be interesting to see in another 500 years just what will be revealed as superstition in our sciences today, in that future.

One thing that can be traced back thru history is the records and teachings that remain a constant regarding Consciousness and God. I'm not speaking of religion and its superstitious twists that are placed upon the infinite reality, but the pure teachings, that have thru the superstitious nature of human ego become a religion in accord with the abilities of the human condition to twist the words and teachings of those masters. Those masters who have and will continue to walk the planet until such a time as humanity can progress beyond its childish nature to condemn anything and everything that does not meet the expectations of changing human beliefs.

Fortunately Truth Absolute has a certain living compassion to survive the destructive nature of the human ego that is bound to suspicion fear and isolation of individuality, that will seek self preservation of ones own selfish desires even if they are preserved at the cost of the rest of humanity and any probable future.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Flex
post Mar 30, 2011, 11:41 AM
Post #20


God
******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 1954
Joined: Oct 17, 2006
From: Bay area CA
Member No.: 5877



Is anyone else as curious as I am to get to know the man behind Joesus?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joesus
post Mar 30, 2011, 01:05 PM
Post #21


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 3895
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
From: nowhere and everywhere
Member No.: 601



There's someone behind me??!!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Flex
post Mar 30, 2011, 01:31 PM
Post #22


God
******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 1954
Joined: Oct 17, 2006
From: Bay area CA
Member No.: 5877



I suspect so smile.gif

For instance little known fact, my true identity is...
http://www.hknet.org.nz/blowing-up-a-catholic-priest.jpg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jakare
post Mar 30, 2011, 05:30 PM
Post #23


Demi-God
*****

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 589
Joined: Feb 24, 2010
Member No.: 32635



QUOTE(Guest @ Mar 30, 2011, 09:47 AM) *

Why not draw the conclusion that there is a God from the facts? Many people do.

I do really hope you dont mean those 10 facts:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=playe...e&v=P47OC439x88


QUOTE(Joesus @ Mar 30, 2011, 05:18 PM) *



QUOTE(Jakare @ Mar 29, 2011, 11:55 PM) *

Last time i had a conversation with Joesus we both got to the idea that trying to prove or reasoning about god existence was headed to fail. Of course we get to that for different reasons.

To refine this statement I would say, "To prove something to another, or to reason with another, is qualified by what the other is willing to see, hear, experience and accept". So any investment in an outcome could come to an experience of failure.

And i accept your refinement. I would love to completely open my mind to others truths and i understand my own position isn´t flawless but you have to set your limit somewhere because..."If you open your mind too much your brain can fell apart".

QUOTE(Flex @ Mar 30, 2011, 09:41 PM) *

Is anyone else as curious as I am to get to know the man behind Joesus?

Im sure Joesus without looking for it is the man behind others...Anyway i dont want to know that will ruin the magic.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joesus
post Mar 30, 2011, 05:39 PM
Post #24


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 3895
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
From: nowhere and everywhere
Member No.: 601



QUOTE(Jakare @ Mar 31, 2011, 01:30 AM) *

And i accept your refinement. I would love to completely open my mind to others truths and i understand my own position isn´t flawless but you have to set your limit somewhere because..."If you open your mind too much your brain can fell apart".

A common misperception. The ego sees any point outside of the relative and known reality as a threat to the position of identity, whether as ones own individuality or that of the field of perception extended from that individuality.

There is a truth which underlies all relative truths. Trust me, the mind can stand to fall apart and immerse itself in that. All becomes much more clear from that point of reference.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jakare
post Mar 30, 2011, 06:13 PM
Post #25


Demi-God
*****

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 589
Joined: Feb 24, 2010
Member No.: 32635



I will take that into acount but its something that takes some time to chew it. If i can chew it at all. lol.

My personal universe is quite undefined and im just filling voids as i grow up and i have got loads of voids to fill. For me the material universe from scientific point of view can be a shadow from the real one but its "The Shadow" if you understandme. Not a delusion from a mind.

You know what Joesus? I apreciate you are around. Sometimes you just write too much and too long for my taste but thats all. My limitations are not your fault.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jakare
post Mar 30, 2011, 06:47 PM
Post #26


Demi-God
*****

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 589
Joined: Feb 24, 2010
Member No.: 32635



QUOTE(Flex @ Mar 30, 2011, 11:31 PM) *

I suspect so smile.gif

For instance little known fact, my true identity is...
http://www.hknet.org.nz/blowing-up-a-catholic-priest.jpg

Nice legs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PJS
post Mar 30, 2011, 08:12 PM
Post #27


Unregistered









God is an invisible personality. We are created in his image.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joesus
post Mar 31, 2011, 04:31 AM
Post #28


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 3895
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
From: nowhere and everywhere
Member No.: 601



God can be an infinite or a finite personality. God is without boundaries and limits. We are imbued with all that God is and are created in the image of God.





"I am the light that is over all things. I am all: from me all came forth, and to me all attained. Split a piece of wood; I am there. Lift up the stone, and you will find me there."

"Images are visible to people, but the light within them is hidden in the image of the Father's light. He will be disclosed, but his image is hidden by his light."

"How miserable is the body that depends on a body, and how miserable is the soul that depends on these two."
-From the Gospel of Thomas
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PJS
post Aug 01, 2011, 09:40 PM
Post #29


Awakening
***

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Aug 17, 2006
Member No.: 5507



Hi. I am Peter Spencer.

Currently I am interested in the discussion "What God is is a Title? Then who is God?".

If this is a topic that interests you as well then consider this link where quite possibly there may be some new information about God and the Garden of Eden (Post 125 "Honor Your Father and Your Mother) brought out in the discussion.

http://brainmeta.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=20953&st=0

Post 164 from the same discussion will give you an answer from the Bible of who the True God really is. The link below.

http://brainmeta.com/forum/index.php?showt...50&#entry115306
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
P.j.S
post Dec 23, 2011, 06:21 AM
Post #30


Overlord
****

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 358
Joined: Jun 12, 2009
Member No.: 32189



QUOTE(PJS @ Aug 01, 2011, 09:40 PM) *

Hi. I am Peter Spencer.

Currently I am interested in the discussion "What God is is a Title? Then who is God?".

If this is a topic that interests you as well then consider this link where quite possibly there may be some new information about God and the Garden of Eden (Post 125 "Honor Your Father and Your Mother) brought out in the discussion.

http://brainmeta.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=20953&st=0

Post 164 from the same discussion will give you an answer from the Bible of who the True God really is. The link below.

http://brainmeta.com/forum/index.php?showt...50&#entry115306

I also have slowly developed the momentum for a school. If you would like to see what has been arranged so far or would like to be a part then please consider the links below.

http://school0pjs1.multiply.com/ Class is in..._..:.:. Time 10:05 AM.

If you want to go to school. Feel free to Join here: http://creativepi.multiply.com/

Please if you want to, see the Note: God is Dead! http://creativepi.multiply.com/notes/item/4

PJS Standing by. God knows why.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st October 2014 - 08:22 PM


Home     |     About     |    Research     |    Forum     |    Feedback  


Copyright © BrainMeta. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Last Modified Tue Jan 17 2006 12:39 am

Consciousness Expansion · Brain Mapping · Neural Circuits · Connectomics  ·  Neuroscience Forum  ·  Brain Maps Blog