![]() ![]() |
| why-think |
Nov 13, 2007, 04:02 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 3 Joined: Nov 13, 2007 Member No.: 14395 |
I am very interested on the topic but know very little in comparison to the people I've seen posting. I was hoping for some help on the topic, including some good sources as well as some of your opinions and/or input.
Any help is greatly appreciated!! (Topic "Time is not real") Thanks a lot, foursquare |
| Rick |
Nov 13, 2007, 04:25 PM
Post
#2
|
![]() Supreme God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 5916 Joined: Jul 23, 2004 From: Sunny Southern California Member No.: 3068 |
Time as we experience in life via consciousness is real. However, time, as conceptualized by people in general and in physics is not real, but an abstraction. Treating time as real leads to fallacies.
For example, the first fallacy one runs into by treating time as real is time travel paradoxes. Around the turn of the 19th century, H.G. Wells popularized the notion of time as the fourth dimension with his science fiction novel The Time Machine. Time travel results in all sorts of nonsensical paradoxes such as the ability to kill one's grandfather. So then one is led to say that perhaps time is real, but one can't go backward in it, only forward. That leads to another problem. If time is a real dimension, then the past and the future have some kind of existence. That is, the future is a real "place" in space-time that if we just wait a bit we will be there. However, a 4-d spacetime with a real time dimension implies that the future is pre-ordained, fixed for all time, and unchangeable. That is clearly not the case (see the free will discussions). A counter-argument (that time is indeed real) is the fact that time is essential in physical laws, forumlas, and computations. Physics equations are full of the variable "t" for time. However, the variable t can be replaced with an equivalent energy term so that "t" disappears from physics. Instead of velocity (meters per second) we have momentum or energy, for example. This makes the equations more complex, and unwieldy, so no physicist does it. Thus it can be seen that time is merely a computational convenience for physics as well as ordinary thinking and planning, not something that has an actual existence. The illusion of the reality of time comes form our very real sensation of the passage of time, which is an aspect of human experience (consciousness). |
| maximus242 |
Nov 13, 2007, 10:15 PM
Post
#3
|
![]() God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 1751 Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Member No.: 4768 |
Oh my, well you asked the right place, I have been thinking about such things a great deal, here are some thoughts I have on this matter.
Time is the perception of actions relative to other actions. That is, Time - is how we as conscious beings perceive the order of events, by judging them relatively to events which we perceive as consistent. In layman's terms this means that we perceive time by comparing different events relative to things such as the sun, daylight, the moon, etc. How we measure time is by taking something fairly consistent, like the cycles of the moon and judging the length of an event relative to something such as the moon. In the modern day we judge events relative to things such as how long it takes for an electrical signal to make its way through a circuit. That would be in reference to what is known as digital watches. Another example is how long it takes a piece of machinery to go through its mechanical circuit and cause a change. This is relative to mechanical watches which count the seconds, hours and even days of what we perceive as time. So, what this means is, Time is a way of judging an action or event based off of another event perceived as being consistent. The reality about time is that it is a way for us to observe the universe by comparing different things in the universe with each other. What we are really saying when we say something like "It will take one month" is that the proposed paper will take one mooon rotation to complete. Thus we are comparing a variable (the paper) to a constant (the moons rotation around the earth) to give a comparison, thereby allowing a person to judge when they can expect to receive said paper. Hope I am not being to cryptic, if you have any questions let me know. |
| trojan_libido |
Nov 14, 2007, 03:37 AM
Post
#4
|
![]() God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 1351 Joined: Sep 19, 2006 From: UK Member No.: 5681 |
Time isn't real: Many terms people are familiar with are entirely human contructs and have no relation to Reality. Time is one of them in my opinion, although as a self-referencing idea it works as max has pointed out. We measure the passing of time by recording whats happening in this moment and giving it a marker like a date. Imagine the world without a recorded history, or without techniques for dating objects...there would only be this moment right here and now. The world would quickly forget grudges in a generation or two, the would become more fluid.
Humans see time as a linear process, everything has a past, present and future. I doubt this is the true reality of what time is. Our science fiction stories of time travel are so far from the reality that we are fools to believe its possible. Time is only a way to measure the transformation of energy in the Universe, we will never be able to return to a previous state by going backwards in it as if times a large hamster wheel. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time QUOTE In 5th century BC Greece, Antiphon the Sophist, in a fragment preserved from his chief work On Truth held that: "Time is not a reality (hupostasis), but a concept (noêma) or a measure (metron)." Parmenides went further, maintaining that time, motion, and change were illusions, leading to the paradoxes of his follower Zeno.[18] Time as illusion is also a common theme in Buddhist thought,[19] and some modern philosophers have carried on with this theme. J. M. E. McTaggart's 1908 The Unreality of Time, for example, argues that time is unreal (see also The flow of time). However, these arguments often center around what it means for something to be "real". Modern physicists generally consider time to be as "real" as space, though others such as Julian Barbour in his The End of Time argue that quantum equations of the universe take their true form when expressed in the timeless configuration spacerealm containing every possible "Now" or momentary configuration of the universe, which he terms 'platonia'.[20] |
| Rick |
Nov 14, 2007, 09:17 AM
Post
#5
|
![]() Supreme God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 5916 Joined: Jul 23, 2004 From: Sunny Southern California Member No.: 3068 |
Also see the very interesting book A World Without Time: The Forgotten Legacy Of Godel And Einstein:
http://www.amazon.com/World-Without-Time-F...n/dp/0465092934 Time is indeed unreal. |
| maximus242 |
Nov 14, 2007, 11:18 AM
Post
#6
|
![]() God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 1751 Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Member No.: 4768 |
In reference to proposed time travel, the actual concept of traveling through time is fairly simple. I think of time as the way of measuring changes in the universe to other changes, so in order to go backwards through time its quite simple.
One would simply need to cause all of the matter in the universe to revert to the state it was in at the proposed time period. Of course actually doing such a thing is a whole different matter. But in essence, since nothing is created or destroyed, you only need to revert matter to a previous state. Of course the implications for such a thing as well as the mind boggling mathematical equations required just to calculate such a feat are enormous. Not to mention the hundreds of things which could go wrong. |
| Lindsay |
Nov 14, 2007, 11:35 AM
Post
#7
|
|
God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 1723 Joined: Feb 07, 2006 From: Markham, just north of Toronto, Ontario, Canada Member No.: 4838 |
THINGS TO THINK ABOUT
==================== ABOUT REALITY http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality ABOUT EXISTENCE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonexistence ABOUT ONTOLOGY--the study of existence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology ABOUT TIME http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time |
| trojan_libido |
Nov 14, 2007, 11:42 AM
Post
#8
|
![]() God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 1351 Joined: Sep 19, 2006 From: UK Member No.: 5681 |
QUOTE(max) One would simply need to cause all of the matter in the universe to revert to the state it was in at the proposed time period This would require that matter had knowledge of its previous state and/or the laws of physics can work in reverse. |
| maximus242 |
Nov 14, 2007, 01:39 PM
Post
#9
|
![]() God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 1751 Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Member No.: 4768 |
Yes I realize there are many problems with the concepts of time travel right now, if there were not, then we would probably have already traveled back in "time".
|
| why-think |
Nov 14, 2007, 02:19 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 3 Joined: Nov 13, 2007 Member No.: 14395 |
Wow! Thanks so much guys. You have all really helped me start to wrap my head around the concept. Max, i will surly need more help and so i will most likely ask.
Thanks again for all the help!!! Please be sure to keep commenting when other thoughts occur on the matter and do not hesitate to contact me (e-mail) if you have anything you want to add. Foursquare |
| Rick |
Nov 14, 2007, 02:49 PM
Post
#11
|
![]() Supreme God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 5916 Joined: Jul 23, 2004 From: Sunny Southern California Member No.: 3068 |
Yes I realize there are many problems with the concepts of time travel right now, if there were not, then we would probably have already traveled back in "time". Indeed. If time travel were technically possible, it will be invented in the future, and there would be time tourists all around us, killing their ancestors' enemies and such. |
| Lindsay |
Nov 14, 2007, 03:01 PM
Post
#12
|
|
God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 1723 Joined: Feb 07, 2006 From: Markham, just north of Toronto, Ontario, Canada Member No.: 4838 |
...If time travel were technically possible, it will be invented in the future, and there would be time tourists all around us, killing their ancestors' enemies and such. Amusing! BUT SERIOUSLY I feel that it will eventually be possible to time-travel, but only to the past. I think of it as the ultimate in lie-detecting. To a limited extent, we can do it now. Without any control over of what we see and hear, we will simply be observers of what actually happened. Imagine the value this will have in our courts. |
| why-think |
Nov 14, 2007, 06:14 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 3 Joined: Nov 13, 2007 Member No.: 14395 |
Thanks for all the input rick!! and others, keep it coming!!
foursquare |
| code buttons |
Nov 14, 2007, 07:32 PM
Post
#14
|
![]() Supreme God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 2450 Joined: Oct 05, 2005 Member No.: 4556 |
In reference to proposed time travel, the actual concept of traveling through time is fairly simple. I think of time as the way of measuring changes in the universe to other changes, so in order to go backwards through time its quite simple. One would simply need to cause all of the matter in the universe to revert to the state it was in at the proposed time period. Of course actually doing such a thing is a whole different matter. But in essence, since nothing is created or destroyed, you only need to revert matter to a previous state. Of course the implications for such a thing as well as the mind boggling mathematical equations required just to calculate such a feat are enormous. Not to mention the hundreds of things which could go wrong. Hey, that's a pretty good observation there Max. But, being that time is the movement of matter throughout space, then we'd have two major "dimensions" that we'd have to manipulate. And then, if energy and matter are exchangable as proposed, there you have a whole other problem! Forget it! I like the "time is not real' statement better already. But, if time is not real, what is real, then? Personally, I view time a little bit the way T_L does: some kind of bipolar abstraction. objective and subjective. Relative and otherwise. Hate it and love it. Too much and not enough of. A year seemed like a decade when I was a kid. My granmother tells me that Christmans comes around every 3 months or so to her, nowadays. Now, as I reason about my purpose in life, and how I am going to go about it, I realize how much I hate time; as it drags on forever, or so it seems, before I can get on with the things I've set out to accomplish before I run out of... you know! |
| Clothes |
May 14, 2011, 04:15 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Unregistered |
Big thanks
|
| njwoods |
Jun 16, 2011, 09:34 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 5 Joined: Apr 03, 2009 Member No.: 32015 |
There was an interesting television program that I saw recently with Stephen Hawking discussing the possibility of time travel. He stated that it is not likely to travel back in time due to a causality feedback loop. His describes by using the analogy of sound traveling into a microphone, travelling out through the speakers which in turn is picked up by the mic and loops in upon itself increasingly until it creates feedback which ultimate will destroy the sound waves (and the equipment etc).
Travel to the future is already possible to some degree. We see it evidenced in small ways like the difference in ground time and objects further away from the gravitational pull of the earth (satellites for instance). Here is a related article putting it more succinctly: dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1269288/STEPHEN-HAWKING-How-build-time-machine.html The easiest way to buy health insurance online. |
| IdentitytheKeystone |
Jul 01, 2011, 11:54 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Unregistered |
thank you for information Hello - My simple contribution is vote that time is simply the measure of change. I think it is not real. In the 4D model of the universt, time is a compression of all change not quatified by the first three dimensions. I think time is not a dimension that can be travelled. I believe the onus is on those who speculate about time travel to explain how the notion of time is real. |
| maximus242 |
Jul 03, 2011, 07:47 AM
Post
#18
|
![]() God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 1751 Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Member No.: 4768 |
In reference to proposed time travel, the actual concept of traveling through time is fairly simple. I think of time as the way of measuring changes in the universe to other changes, so in order to go backwards through time its quite simple. One would simply need to cause all of the matter in the universe to revert to the state it was in at the proposed time period. Of course actually doing such a thing is a whole different matter. But in essence, since nothing is created or destroyed, you only need to revert matter to a previous state. Of course the implications for such a thing as well as the mind boggling mathematical equations required just to calculate such a feat are enormous. Not to mention the hundreds of things which could go wrong. Hey, that's a pretty good observation there Max. But, being that time is the movement of matter throughout space, then we'd have two major "dimensions" that we'd have to manipulate. And then, if energy and matter are exchangable as proposed, there you have a whole other problem! Forget it! I like the "time is not real' statement better already. But, if time is not real, what is real, then? Personally, I view time a little bit the way T_L does: some kind of bipolar abstraction. objective and subjective. Relative and otherwise. Hate it and love it. Too much and not enough of. A year seemed like a decade when I was a kid. My granmother tells me that Christmans comes around every 3 months or so to her, nowadays. Now, as I reason about my purpose in life, and how I am going to go about it, I realize how much I hate time; as it drags on forever, or so it seems, before I can get on with the things I've set out to accomplish before I run out of... you know! to me time is measurement |
| Joesus |
Jul 03, 2011, 07:51 AM
Post
#19
|
![]() Supreme God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 3819 Joined: Sep 26, 2003 From: nowhere and everywhere Member No.: 601 |
An effect of identity with evolution. What comes first, what comes second etc. etc.
|
| maximus242 |
Jul 03, 2011, 08:13 PM
Post
#20
|
![]() God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 1751 Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Member No.: 4768 |
Its possible that time is non linear but human perception of time certainly appears to be linear
|
| Joesus |
Jul 04, 2011, 06:29 AM
Post
#21
|
![]() Supreme God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 3819 Joined: Sep 26, 2003 From: nowhere and everywhere Member No.: 601 |
Its possible that time is non linear but human perception of time certainly appears to be linear Time is a cognitive, human endeavor to put thoughts into order as an experience of cause and effect. Time is linear, but Time is not a commanding or principle ruler of consciousness. Consciousness creates the idea and experience of time but is not bound by time. Consciousness moves in and out of time and exists in all times at all times where time does not exist.. NOW is. Awareness can span past present and future probabilities in multidimensional realities without any linear progression or regression. |
| maximus242 |
Jul 04, 2011, 08:45 AM
Post
#22
|
![]() God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 1751 Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Member No.: 4768 |
interesting point, though i would say its not put into order as cause and effect that is a separate part of consciousness used in evaluation and abstraction.
That is quite an interesting set of concepts you put forth though. Basically it comes down to a question of what is our experience of reality, where do you draw the line? |
| Joesus |
Jul 04, 2011, 01:37 PM
Post
#23
|
![]() Supreme God ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 3819 Joined: Sep 26, 2003 From: nowhere and everywhere Member No.: 601 |
interesting point, though i would say its not put into order as cause and effect that is a separate part of consciousness used in evaluation and abstraction. The idea of cause and effect is often evaluated as an abstract. However as a universal law, it is perfectly mechanical. Take consciousness into activity and the result is manifest reality, at all levels of perception and dimensional possibilities. It is the reason the Universe exists and can be experienced. Awareness can be isolated into one idea and experience or in a thousand places at the same time without overwhelming consciousness. That is quite an interesting set of concepts you put forth though. Basically it comes down to a question of what is our experience of reality, where do you draw the line? I personally see no line as necessary to the isolation of any experience or thought. Life is perpetual and without end. Only the ego draws a line at the end of a particular storyline or death. Consciousness does not die or end when the personal story transitions into something different any more than a man dies when his eyes close at night to enter a different dream than the one he dreams during the day. If you don't draw any lines what will your experience of reality be? Obviously we all share a perception that reality exists but no two people see the world or feel it exactly the same way. This would lead us to the awareness that the world is not a something that can only be seen and experienced one way, but rather it is something that we decide is real or not real, and our beliefs are altering our experiences as they change. |
| Digital Apotheosis |
Apr 16, 2013, 04:45 AM
Post
#24
|
![]() Newbie ![]() Group: Basic Member Posts: 3 Joined: Apr 16, 2013 Member No.: 35051 |
Time is a human measurement of motion. Motion tends to flow in the direction of increased entropy.
But time is just another dimension like the three spatial dimensions... so past and future already exist |
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 08:33 AM |