BrainMeta'   Connectomics'  

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Parallel Universes
rhymer
post Sep 24, 2007, 07:52 AM
Post #1


Supreme God
*******

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 2093
Joined: Feb 27, 2003
Member No.: 385



An interesting development is reported at the web site

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=pa...article=1&cat=0

With my knowledge and experience I find the principle of parallel universes (to the infinite extent propounded) as most improbable.

In particular I can see no 'purpose' or advantage for Nature.

I do not presume, however that Nature has purpose!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Enki
post Sep 27, 2007, 08:07 PM
Post #2


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 2794
Joined: Sep 10, 2004
From: Eridug
Member No.: 3458



Fractal grown on other fractal, each utilizing elements of each other.
Thank you for the link Rhymer.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rick
post Sep 28, 2007, 11:21 AM
Post #3


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 5916
Joined: Jul 23, 2004
From: Sunny Southern California
Member No.: 3068



It's one of the most useless concepts conceivable.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Enki
post Sep 28, 2007, 09:11 PM
Post #4


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 2794
Joined: Sep 10, 2004
From: Eridug
Member No.: 3458



I disagree Rick.

The concepts of Parallel Universes (Worlds) are very important in physics.

There is a chap -Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim Paracelsus having expressed interesting issues on the topic.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rick
post Oct 01, 2007, 11:11 AM
Post #5


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 5916
Joined: Jul 23, 2004
From: Sunny Southern California
Member No.: 3068



The "many worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics is less useful than the Copehhagen interpretation, which is fundamentally incorrect. I like Bishop Berkeley's view.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Enki
post Oct 02, 2007, 07:13 AM
Post #6


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 2794
Joined: Sep 10, 2004
From: Eridug
Member No.: 3458



Oh my dear Bishop Berkeley. How I love that clever man.
I think the best way is to approach to the problem from the Fluctuation Theory rather than quantum mechanics.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ochocinco
post Mar 25, 2008, 10:02 PM
Post #7


Newbie
*

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Member No.: 19938



The correct interpretation may not be the most "useful" one.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
code buttons
post Mar 27, 2008, 09:16 AM
Post #8


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 2450
Joined: Oct 05, 2005
Member No.: 4556



QUOTE(Enki @ Oct 02, 2007, 07:13 AM) *

I think the best way is to approach to the problem from the Fluctuation Theory rather than quantum mechanics.

Care to elaborate, sir?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trip like I do
post Apr 05, 2008, 06:18 PM
Post #9


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 5156
Joined: Aug 11, 2004
From: Earth^2
Member No.: 3202



stop thinking literally and start thinking metaphorically
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Enki
post Apr 23, 2008, 11:15 PM
Post #10


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 2794
Joined: Sep 10, 2004
From: Eridug
Member No.: 3458



QUOTE(code buttons @ Mar 27, 2008, 09:16 AM) *

QUOTE(Enki @ Oct 02, 2007, 07:13 AM) *

I think the best way is to approach to the problem from the Fluctuation Theory rather than quantum mechanics.

Care to elaborate, sir?


No.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joesus
post Apr 24, 2008, 12:08 AM
Post #11


Supreme God
*******

Group: Basic Member
Posts: 4066
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
From: nowhere and everywhere
Member No.: 601



It isn't always easy to elaborate on problems that don't exist.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th October 2017 - 12:26 PM


Home     |     About     |    Research     |    Forum     |    Feedback  


Copyright BrainMeta. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Last Modified Tue Jan 17 2006 12:39 am

Consciousness Expansion · Brain Mapping · Neural Circuits · Connectomics  ·  Neuroscience Forum  ·  Brain Maps Blog
 · Connectomics · Connectomics  ·  shawn mikula  ·  shawn mikula  ·  articles